Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34775526›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2022

A reverse form of Linburg-Comstock variation with comments on its etiology and demonstration of interactive 3D portable document format.

Wijittra Prasatkaew, Nutmethee Kruepunga, Laphatrada Yurasakpong, Ratiyakorn Korkong, Somkamon Ardsawang, Sirapatsorn Ronglakorn, Kanit Sananpanich, Siwat Suksri, Athikhun Suwannakhan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wijittra PrasatkaewDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nutmethee KruepungaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Laphatrada YurasakpongDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratiyakorn KorkongMedia Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somkamon ArdsawangMedia Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirapatsorn RonglakornMedia Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanit SananpanichDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Siwat SuksriMedia Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Athikhun SuwannakhanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. athikhun.suw@mahidol.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-0244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTwo most common variations of flexor pollicis longus include its accessory head and its connection with the flexor digitorum profundus of the index (Linburg-Comstock variation). In addition, while three-dimensional (3D) screening has widely been used in anatomical education, its use as reporting tool in anatomical research is still limited. The objective of this study is to report a previously unrecognized form of the accessory head of flexor pollicis longus, discuss the potential etiology of Linburg-Comstock variation, and pilot the 3D scanning of a large-scale anatomical structure.

methodsAn unusual tendon slip was discovered during a routine dissection in the anterior compartment of the right forearm of a 54-year-old male cadaver. A 3D scanner was used to capture the surface topography of the specimen and an interactive portable document format (PDF) was created.

resultsAn anomalous tendon was found originating from the lateral aspect of the flexor digitorum profundus muscle. This variant tendon then inserted onto the medial surface of the flexor pollicis longus tendon before entering the carpal tunnel. The variation resembles a reverse form of Linburg-Comstock variation, because pulling this variant tendon resulted in simultaneous flexion of the interphalangeal joint of thumb.

conclusionSurgeons should be aware of the reverse Linburg-Comstock variation, because it may not be detectable by the conventional provocative testing. Linburg-Comstock variation may be classified as an anatomical variant or a secondarily acquired condition depending on its type. Our demonstration of interactive 3D-PDF file highlights its potential use for delivering anatomical information in future cadaveric studies.

Indexed as

Hand Deformities, CongenitalHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularTendonsThumb3D scanning3D visualizationAnatomical variationsFlexor digitorum profundusFlexor pollicis longusLinburg–Comstock variationSurface rendering

Identifiers

PMID34775526
PMCPMC8590423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.