Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34775146›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation and cellular therapy2022

Umbilical Cord Blood or HLA-Haploidentical Transplantation: Real-World Outcomes versus Randomized Trial Outcomes.

Paul V O'Donnell, Claudio G Brunstein, Ephraim J Fuchs, Mei-Jie Zhang, Mariam Allbee-Johnson, Joseph H Antin, Eric S Leifer, Hany Elmariah, Michael R Grunwald, Hamza Hashmi and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Total body irradiation-based conditioning in allogeneic transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies: impact in outcomes by stem-cell source.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Graft Source Choice.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Optimal GVHD Prophylaxis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Paul V O'DonnellHematopoietic Cell Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: pvodonnell@mgh.harvard.edu.
Claudio G BrunsteinDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ephraim J FuchsSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mei-Jie ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Mariam Allbee-JohnsonCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Joseph H AntinDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric S LeiferOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Hany ElmariahDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Michael R GrunwaldDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Hamza HashmiDivision of Hematology Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Mary M HorowitzCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
John M MagenauDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Navneet MajhailBlood and Marrow Transplant Program, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Filippo MilanoAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Lawrence E MorrisBlood and Marrow Transplant Program, Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andrew R RezvaniDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Joseph P McGuirkDivision of Hematology, University Kansas, Westwood, Kansas.
Richard J JonesSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mary EapenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
BMT CTN Core - Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterUG1HL069246 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STEPHANIE J LEE · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
BMT CTN Core - Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and MGH ConsortiumUG1HL069249 · NHLBI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Mahasweta Gooptu · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
Translational Research in Blood &Marrow TransplantationU01HL069310 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, RICHARD J · 2001 to 2010
$1.7M
BMT Core - Stanford UniversityUG1HL069291 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Lori Muffly · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
Translational Research in Blood and Marrow TransplantationUG1HL069310 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARD J JONES · 2017 to 2026
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069310NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL069246NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL069249NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL069291NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL069310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials offer the highest-quality data for modifying clinical practice. Results of a phase III randomized trial of nonmyeloablative transplantation for adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies with 2 umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (n = 183) or HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM; n = 154) revealed a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 41% after Haplo-BM transplantation and 35% after 2-unit UCB transplantation (P = .41), with overall survival (OS) of 57% and 46%, respectively (P = .04). We sought to examine the generalizability of BMT CTN 1101 to a contemporaneous cohort beyond the trial's prespecified 2-year outcomes. All transplantations were performed between June 2012 and June 2018 in the United States. We hypothesized that the results of a rigorous phase III randomized trial would be generalizable. Changes in graft selection for HLA-haploidentical relative transplantation during the trial period allowed comparison of outcomes after transplantation with Haplo-BM with those after haploidentical peripheral blood (Haplo-PB). The trial's broad eligibility criteria were applied to the data source of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to select nontrial subjects. Extended follow-up of trial subjects was obtained from this data source. Three separate analyses were performed: (1) trial subjects beyond the trial's 2-year endpoint; (2) comparison of trial subjects with a contemporaneous cohort of nontrial subjects (195 2-unit UCB, 358 Haplo-BM, and 403 Haplo-PB); and (3) comparison of nontrial subjects by donor and graft type. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models for comparison of outcomes by treatment groups. With longer follow-up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%; P = .08) and OS (42% versus 36%; P = .06) were not significantly different between the treatment groups. We then compared the trial results with outcomes of comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year OS did not differ between trial and nontrial 2-unit UCB transplantations (36% versus 41%; P = .48) or between trial and nontrial Haplo-BM transplantations (42% versus 47%; P = .80), confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in PFS. With substantially larger numbers of nontrial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after nontrial Haplo-BM compared with trial 2-unit UCB (47% versus 36%; P = .012). Nontrial patients who underwent Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared with trial Haplo-BM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; P = .044) and nontrial Haplo-BM (HR, 0.78; P = .026). Similarly, survival was better after Haplo-PB compared with trial UCB (HR, 0.57; P < .0001) and nontrial UCB (HR, 0.63; P = .0002). When considering alternative donor low-intensity conditioning regimen transplantation, a haploidentical relative is preferred, and PB is the preferred graft source.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseTransplantation, HaploidenticalAdultFetal BloodHumansTransplantation ConditioningUnrelated DonorsCord bloodHLA-haploidenticalLeukemiaLymphomaNonmyeloablative regimenSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34775146
PMCPMC8882346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.