Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774930›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2022

Results from a United States Investigational Device Study of Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization in the Treatment of Shoulder Pain: The Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization Study.

Sandeep Bagla, Sameer Nagda, Rachel Piechowiak, Julie Orlando, Abin Sajan, Ari Isaacson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Improving Standards for Embolization of Adhesive Capsulitis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Outcomes of Shoulder Artery Embolization for Adhesive Capsulitis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Musculoskeletal Embolotherapy.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandeep BaglaProstate Centers USA, Falls Church, Virginia. Electronic address: sbagla@prostatecentersusa.com.
Sameer NagdaAnderson Orthopedic Clinic, Arlington, Virginia.
Rachel PiechowiakProstate Centers USA, Reston, Virginia.
Julie OrlandoVascular Institute of Virginia, Woodbridge, Virginia.
Abin SajanDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ari IsaacsonProstate Centers USA, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USSociety of Interventional Radiology · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVascular Institute of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of arterial embolization to relieve shoulder pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis (AC). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 20 patients (18 females, 2 males; mean age, 51 years) with AC resistant to >30 days of conservative treatment were enrolled in a multicenter prospective study. Adhesive capsulitis embolization was performed with 75-μm or 200-μm spherical particles. Subjects were assessed before and after the procedure with magnetic resonance imaging, visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; 0-100) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES; 0-100) scores. Adverse events were recorded at all follow-up time points.

resultsHypervascularity was identified and embolization was technically successful in all patients, with 83 arteries embolized in 20 patients. Baseline VAS, SANE, and ASES scores before the procedure were 89.2 mm, 27.2, and 30.9, respectively. The 1-month (n = 19), 3-month (n = 18), and 6-month (n = 12) follow-ups demonstrated significant improvements. At the 1-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 31.8 (P = 1.2E-11), SANE score increased by 22.1 (P = 1.8E-8), and ASES score increased by 14.2 (P = 4.3E-5). At the 6-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 62.1 (P = 7.0E-11), SANE score increased by 55.4 (P = 4.1E-10), and ASES score increased by 44.5 (P = 1.8E-6). Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the study ended early; 6 patients did not complete the 6-month follow-up. No major adverse events were noted.

conclusionsInterim findings suggest that arterial embolization is safe and effective for patients with AC refractory to conservative treatment.

Indexed as

BursitisEmbolization, TherapeuticShoulder JointFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesShoulder PainTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34774930
OpenAlexW3213081770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.