Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774880›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Who is likely to vacillate in their COVID-19 vaccination decision? Free-riding intention and post-positive reluctance.

Marta Caserotti, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Paolo Girardi, Alessandra Tasso, Chiara Buizza, Valentina Candini, Cristina Zarbo, Flavia Chiarotti, Sonia Brescianini, Gemma Calamandrei and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marta CaserottiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Italy, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: marta.caserotti@unipd.it.
Teresa GavaruzziDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Italy, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: teresa.gavaruzzi@unipd.it.
Paolo GirardiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Italy, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy; Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Italy, Via Cesare Battisti 241, 35121 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.girardi@unipd.it.
Alessandra TassoDepartment of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Italy, via Paradiso 12, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: alessandra.tasso@unife.it.
Chiara BuizzaIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Unit of Epidemiological Psychiatry and Evaluation, Italy.
Valentina CandiniIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Unit of Epidemiological Psychiatry and Evaluation, Via Pilastroni 4, Brescia 25125, Italy. Electronic address: vcandini@fatebenefratelli.eu.
Cristina ZarboIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Unit of Epidemiological Psychiatry and Evaluation, Via Pilastroni 4, Brescia 25125, Italy. Electronic address: czarbo@fatebenefratelli.eu.
Flavia ChiarottiCentre for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299-00161 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: flavia.chiarotti@iss.it.
Sonia BrescianiniCentre for Behavioral Science and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 266, 00161 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: sonia.brescianini@iss.it.
Gemma CalamandreiCentre for Behavioral Science and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 266, 00161 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: gemma.calamandrei@iss.it.
Fabrizio StaraceAUSL Modena, Viale L.A. Muratori 201, 41124 Modena, Italy. Electronic address: f.starace@ausl.mo.it.
Giovanni de GirolamoIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125 Brescia, Italy. Electronic address: gdegirolamo@fatebenefratelli.eu.
Lorella LottoDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Italy, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: lorella.lotto@unipd.it.
University of Padua · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the actual availability of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the pandemic, many people are still vacillating in their decision to vaccinate. In this study, we considered the effect of two relevant contextual issues on vaccination intention: the number of people infected with COVID-19 is increasing, and the pace of vaccination is gaining speed. Specifically, we hypothesized that having already contracted SARS-CoV-2 (post-positive reluctance) could lead people to underestimate the importance of vaccination. Moreover, as the number of vaccinated people increases, more hesitant people could fall into the free-riding intention category, benefitting from the immunity provided by others' vaccinations. Vaccine hesitancy becomes more critical as the vaccination campaign proceeds: at one point, it will be inevitable to deal with hesitant people. This study is part of a WHO Regional Office for Europe project and involved a representative sample of 5006 Italians interviewed in January-February 2021. In case of post-positive reluctance, both young age and female gender increase vaccine hesitancy, while a high level of education reduces free-riding intention. Considering post-positive reluctance and free riding, a protective effect on hesitancy is associated with negative affective states, adherence to protective behaviors, trust in health information sources, and resilience. In contrast, increased vaccine hesitancy is associated with a high level of conspiracy-mindedness and trust in media information sources. Recognizing and studying the post-positive reluctance and the phenomenon of free-riding people can help us to become more efficient in combatting the virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansIntentionSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Free-riding intentionPost-positive reluctanceVaccination hesitancyVaccination intention

Identifiers

PMID34774880
PMCPMC8585567
OpenAlexW3212713563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.