Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774756›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2022

Public opinion on a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy in France: a cross-sectional survey.

Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers, Marion Bonneton, Patrick Peretti-Watel, Pierre Verger, Odile Launay, Jeremy K Ward

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Do COVID-19 Vaccination Policies Backfire? The Effects of Mandates, Vaccination Passports, and Financial Incentives on COVID-19 Vaccination.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amandine Gagneux-BrunonCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Univ Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR530, France; CIC INSERM 1408 Vaccinologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, France; Chaire PREVACCI, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France; Inserm, F-CRIN, I-REIVAC/COVIREIVAC, 75679 Paris, France. Electronic address: amandine.gagneux-brunon@chu-st-etienne.fr.
Elisabeth Botelho-NeversCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Univ Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR530, France; CIC INSERM 1408 Vaccinologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, France; Chaire PREVACCI, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Marion BonnetonInserm, F-CRIN, I-REIVAC/COVIREIVAC, 75679 Paris, France.
Patrick Peretti-WatelObservatoire Régional de La Santé Paca, Marseille, France; VITROME (Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA), Marseille, France.
Pierre VergerObservatoire Régional de La Santé Paca, Marseille, France; VITROME (Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA), Marseille, France.
Odile LaunayInserm, F-CRIN, I-REIVAC/COVIREIVAC, 75679 Paris, France; Université de Paris, Inserm CIC 1417, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75679 Paris, France.
Jeremy K WardVITROME (Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA), Marseille, France; CERMES3 (INSERM, CNRS, EHESS, Université de Paris), Villejuif, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReaching the last pockets of unvaccinated people is challenging, and has led to the consideration of mandatory vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our aim was to assess attitudes toward mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in France before the announcement of-and factors associated with opposition to-this type of policy.

methodsBetween the 10th and 23rd May 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a representative sample of the French population aged 18 and over, and a specific sample of the French senior population aged over 65.

resultsAmong 3056 respondents, 1314 (43.0%) were in favour of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination, 1281 (41.9%) were opposed to such a policy, and 461 (15.1%) were undecided. Among opponents to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for the general population, 385 (30.05%) were in favour of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs). In multivariate analysis, the age groups 18-24 and 25-34 years were significantly more opposed than the reference group (>75 years old) with respective adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 4.67 (1.73-12.61) and 3.74 (1.57-8.93). Having no intention of getting COVID-19 vaccination was strongly associated with opposition to mandatory vaccination (aOR 10.67, 95%CI 6.41-17.76). In comparison with partisans of the centre, partisans of the far left and green parties were more likely to be opposed to mandatory COVID-19 vaccine, with respective aORs (95%CI) of 1.89 (1.06-3.38) and 2.08 (1.14-3.81).

conclusionAttitudes toward mandatory COVID-19 vaccination are split in the French general population, and the debate might become politicized.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFranceHumansPolicyPublic OpinionSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAttitudesCOVID-19Mandatory vaccinePartisanshipPoliticsVaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34774756
PMCPMC8912915
OpenAlexW3212587822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.