Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774254›Full record

ArticleSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2021

Spatial variation and hotspot detection of COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan, 2020.

Andrey Kuznetsov, Veronika Sadovskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Methods Used in the Spatial and Spatiotemporal Analysis of COVID-19 Epidemiology: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrey KuznetsovNational Scientific Center of Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan. Electronic address: dr.a.n.kuznetsov@gmail.com.
Veronika SadovskayaNational Scientific Center of Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is the life-threatening infectious disease of zoonotic origin that has epidemic spread in Kazakhstan. The use of geoepidemiological techniques to detect territories of risk (hotspots) is essential for implementing control measures in the target area. This study aims to conduct spatial analysis of the COVID-19 epidemic in Kazakhstan to increase understanding of the current features of the virus distribution and to explore its geographical patterns, especially its spatial clustering.

methodsWe used geographic information software (QGIS, GeoDa) to perform spatial analysis (Nearest Neighbour Analysis, Global Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi*, LISA) and to detect COVID-19 risk clusters in the entire territory of Kazakhstan.

resultsClusters of COVID-19 cases were detected using the Getis-Ord GI* analysis (with first order Queen Continuity matrix) in two oblasts of Kazakhstan: Almaty (Iliyskiy, Karasayskiy, Raiymbekskiy, Talgarskiy rayons and city of Almaty) and Aqmola (Arshalynskiy, Ereymengauskiy, Korgalzhynskiy and Shortandinskiy rayons). LISA defined four High-High clusters of COVID-19 cases in the Almaty oblast (Iliyskiy, Karasayskiy and Talgarskiy rayons) and city of Almaty.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cluster AnalysisHumansKazakhstanSARS-CoV-2Spatial AnalysisCluster detectionCOVID-19Spatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID34774254
PMCPMC8096755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.