Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774225›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2021

Long-term outcomes of patients with active melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 204): final results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study.

Hussein A Tawbi, Peter A Forsyth, F Stephen Hodi, Alain P Algazi, Omid Hamid, Christopher D Lao, Stergios J Moschos, Michael B Atkins, Karl Lewis, Michael A Postow and 15 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 187 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02320058 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-Center Phase 2 Open-Label Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Subjects With Melanoma Metastatic to the Brain Treated With Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Followed by Nivolumab Monotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2015 to 2020Enrolled119ConditionsMelanomaArmsIpilimumab, Nivolumab
NCT06887088 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Phase II, Single Arm, Multicentre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Activity of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Followed by Cemiplimab And Fianlimab in Patients With BRAF Mutated Melanoma and Symptomatic Brain Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrupo Español Multidisciplinar de MelanomaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled33ConditionsMelanoma BRAF V600E/K Mutated, Melanoma and Brain MetastasesArmsEncorafenib + Binimetinib, cemiplimab+fianlimab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. SEOM-GEM clinical guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients With AdvancedJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Brain metastasis: Opportunities for novel therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Hussein A TawbiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: HTawbi@mdanderson.org.
Peter A ForsythDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
F Stephen HodiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Alain P AlgaziMelanoma Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Omid HamidMelanoma Center, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher D LaoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stergios J MoschosDivision of Hematology & Oncology, The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Michael B AtkinsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC, USA.
Karl LewisDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Michael A PostowDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Reena P ThomasDepartment of Neurology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
John GlaspyJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sekwon JangInova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Nikhil I KhushalaniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL USA.
Anna C PavlickDepartment of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Marc S ErnstoffDepartment of Immuno-Oncology, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
David A ReardonCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ragini KudchadkarDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ahmad TarhiniDepartments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Caroline ChungUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Corey RitchingsBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Piyush DuraniBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Margarita AskelsonBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Igor PuzanovRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kim A MargolinDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USAngeles Clinic and Research Institute · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCornell University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVirginia Cancer Institute · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombination nivolumab plus ipilimumab was efficacious in patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in CheckMate 204, but showed low efficacy in patients with symptomatic MBM. Here, we provide final 3-year follow-up data from the trial.

methodsThis open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study (CheckMate 204) included adults (aged ≥18 years) with measurable MBM (0·5-3·0 cm in diameter). Asymptomatic patients (cohort A) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and no neurological symptoms or baseline corticosteroid use; symptomatic patients (cohort B) had an ECOG performance status of 0-2 with stable neurological symptoms and could be receiving low-dose dexamethasone. Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was given intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was intracranial clinical benefit rate (complete responses, partial responses, or stable disease lasting ≥6 months) assessed in all treated patients. Intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival were key secondary endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02320058.

findingsBetween Feb 19, 2015, and Nov 1, 2017, 119 (72%) of 165 screened patients were enrolled and treated: 101 patients were asymptomatic (cohort A; median follow-up 34·3 months [IQR 14·7-36·4]) and 18 were symptomatic (cohort B; median follow-up 7·5 months [1·2-35·2]). Investigator-assessed intracranial clinical benefit was observed in 58 (57·4% [95% CI 47·2-67·2]) of 101 patients in cohort A and three (16·7% [3·6-41·4]) of 18 patients in cohort B; investigator-assessed objective response was observed in 54 (53·5% [43·3-63·5]) patients in cohort A and three (16·7% [3·6-41·4]) patients in cohort B. 33 (33%) patients in cohort A and three (17%) patients in cohort B had an investigator-assessed intracranial complete response. For patients in cohort A, 36-month intracranial progression-free survival was 54·1% (95% CI 42·7-64·1) and overall survival was 71·9% (61·8-79·8). For patients in cohort B, 36-month intracranial progression-free survival was 18·9% (95% CI 4·6-40·5) and overall survival was 36·6% (14·0-59·8). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (15 [15%] of 101 patients each) in cohort A; no grade 3 TRAEs occurred in more than one patient each in cohort B, and no grade 4 events occurred. The most common serious TRAEs were colitis, diarrhoea, hypophysitis, and increased alanine aminotransferase (five [5%] of each among the 101 patients in cohort A); no serious TRAE occurred in more than one patient each in cohort B. There was one treatment-related death (myocarditis in cohort A).

interpretationThe durable 3-year response, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients support first-line use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Symptomatic disease in patients with MBM remains difficult to treat, but some patients achieve a long-term response with the combination.

fundingBristol Myers Squibb.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisSurvival RateIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID34774225
PMCPMC9328029
OpenAlexW3214532628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.