Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774196›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2021

Efficacy, safety, and lot-to-lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): interim results of a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Raches Ella, Siddarth Reddy, William Blackwelder, Varsha Potdar, Pragya Yadav, Vamshi Sarangi, Vinay K Aileni, Suman Kanungo, Sanjay Rai, Prabhakar Reddy and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04641481 (An Event-Driven, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Immunogenicity, Lot-to-Lot Consistency of BBV152, a Whole-Virion Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults≥18 Yrs of Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 225 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04641481 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

An Event-Driven, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Immunogenicity, Lot-to-Lot Consistency of BBV152, a Whole-Virion Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults≥18 Yrs of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorBharat Biotech International LimitedRan2020 to 2022Enrolled25,800ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV InfectionArmsBBV152, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. COVID-19 pandemic: the delta variant, T-cell responses, and the efficacy of developing vaccines.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Trial

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Raches EllaBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
Siddarth ReddyBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
William BlackwelderWB Statistical Consulting, Bethesda, MA, USA.
Varsha PotdarNational Institute of Virology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Pune, India.
Pragya YadavNational Institute of Virology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Pune, India.
Vamshi SarangiBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
Vinay K AileniBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
Suman KanungoNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Kolkatta, India.
Sanjay RaiAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Prabhakar ReddyNizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Savita VermaPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India.
Chandramani SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Sagar RedkarRedkar Hospital, Panjim, India.
Satyajit MohapatraSRM Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Anil PandeyESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, India.
Pajanivel RanganadinMahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India.
Raghavendra GumashtaDepartment of Community Medicine, People's College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, India.
Manish MultaniRahate Surgical Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Shameem MohammadAligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Parul BhattGMERS Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Laxmi KumariGovernment Fever Hospital, Guntur, India.
Gajanan SapkalNational Institute of Virology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Pune, India.
Nivedita GuptaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Priya AbrahamNational Institute of Virology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Pune, India.
Samiran PandaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Sai PrasadBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
Balram BhargavaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Krishna EllaBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.
Krishna Mohan VadrevuBharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: kmohan@bharatbiotech.com.
COVAXIN Study Group
Bharat Biotech (India) · INAligarh Muslim University · INB.J. Medical College · INPeople’s University · INICMR-National Institute of Virology · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INESIC Hospital · INNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · INPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INMahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute · INSri Ramachandra Medical Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report the clinical efficacy against COVID-19 infection of BBV152, a whole virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel-IMDG) in Indian adults.

methodsWe did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial in 25 Indian hospitals or medical clinics to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunological lot consistency of BBV152. Adults (age ≥18 years) who were healthy or had stable chronic medical conditions (not an immunocompromising condition or requiring treatment with immunosuppressive therapy) were randomised 1:1 with a computer-generated randomisation scheme (stratified for the presence or absence of chronic conditions) to receive two intramuscular doses of vaccine or placebo administered 4 weeks apart. Participants, investigators, study coordinators, study-related personnel, the sponsor, and nurses who administered the vaccines were masked to treatment group allocation; an unmasked contract research organisation and a masked expert adjudication panel assessed outcomes. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the BBV152 vaccine in preventing a first occurrence of laboratory-confirmed (RT-PCR-positive) symptomatic COVID-19 (any severity), occurring at least 14 days after the second dose in the per-protocol population. We also assessed safety and reactogenicity throughout the duration of the study in all participants who had received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. This report contains interim results (data cutoff May 17, 2021) regarding immunogenicity and safety outcomes (captured on days 0 to 56) and efficacy results with a median of 99 days for the study population. The trial was registered on the Indian Clinical Trials Registry India, CTRI/2020/11/028976, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04641481 (active, not recruiting).

findingsBetween Nov 16, 2020, and Jan 7, 2021, we recruited 25 798 participants who were randomly assigned to receive BBV152 or placebo; 24 419 received two doses of BBV152 (n=12 221) or placebo (n=12 198). Efficacy analysis was dependent on having 130 cases of symptomatic COVID-19, which occurred when 16 973 initially seronegative participants had at least 14 days follow-up after the second dose. 24 (0·3%) cases occurred among 8471 vaccine recipients and 106 (1·2%) among 8502 placebo recipients, giving an overall estimated vaccine efficacy of 77·8% (95% CI 65·2-86·4). In the safety population (n=25 753), 5959 adverse events occurred in 3194 participants. BBV152 was well tolerated; the same proportion of participants reported adverse events in the vaccine group (1597 [12·4%] of 12 879) and placebo group (1597 [12·4%] of 12 874), with no clinically significant differences in the distributions of solicited, unsolicited, or serious adverse events between the groups, and no cases of anaphylaxis or vaccine-related deaths.

interpretationBBV152 was highly efficacious against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 disease in adults. Vaccination was well tolerated with no safety concerns raised in this interim analysis.

fundingBharat Biotech International and Indian Council of Medical Research.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineVaccine EfficacyAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdultCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaMaleVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicCOVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID34774196
PMCPMC8584828
OpenAlexW3211505703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.