Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774034›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Exploring the enablers and barriers to social prescribing for people living with long-term neurological conditions: a focus group investigation.

Suzanne Simpson, Moira Furlong, Clarissa Giebel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07768332 (Exploring the Feasibility of Social Prescription in People on the Autism Spectrum), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07768332 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Exploring the Feasibility of Social Prescription in People on the Autism Spectrum

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD, Autism, Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD)ArmsIndependent museum visit, Guided museum visits and group discussions, Museum visit with a friend
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Social Prescribing Among Patients in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Returning to Leisure Activity Post-Stroke: Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne SimpsonThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerely, Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7LJ, UK. suzanne.simpson12@nhs.net.
Moira FurlongNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Clarissa GiebelNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Motor Neurone Disease Association · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWalton Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with Long Term Neurological Conditions (LTNCs) value peer support and social activities. Psychological support and wellbeing enables them to manage their condition. Social prescribing is a formal process of referring patients to a link worker to co-design a plan to improve their health and wellbeing. Intervention involves supporting participation in activities based within the individual's local community. This study aimed to explore the barriers and enablers to accessing social prescribing for people living with LTNCs (plwLTNCs).

methodsA total of four focus groups were carried out with 17 participants, including different neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Fragile X Syndrome, epilepsy, and traumatic brain injury. Two participants were family carers and supported people living with epilepsy and motor neurone disease. Findings were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsFive themes were identified: (1) Lack of knowledge; (2) Service provision difficulties; (3) Benefits of social prescribing activities; (4) Physical barriers and (5) Psychological barriers. There was a lack of knowledge about social prescribing and what it actually was. Participants anticipated service provision difficulties relating to funding, link workers need for knowledge of LTNC's and for activities to be varied and individualised. The potential benefits of social prescribing activities were recognised across the groups especially its potential to tackle loneliness and to offer plwLTNC's purpose. Participants highlighted a number of physical barriers such as transport and accessibility; and psychological barriers such as anxiety and stigma.

conclusionSocial prescribing aims to address the health inequalities of those living with long-term conditions, however currently it is likely to exclude plwLTNCs. Recommendations for practice and future research are made.

Indexed as

CaregiversMotor Neuron DiseaseFocus GroupsHumansLonelinessQualitative ResearchBarriersEnablersLink workersNeurological conditionsOccupational therapySocial prescribingWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID34774034
PMCPMC8590354
OpenAlexW3158586770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.