Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34774033›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2021

Views of university students in Jordan towards Biobanking.

Faisal Khatib, Dayana Jibrin, Joud Al-Majali, Mira Elhussieni, Sharifeh Almasaid, Mamoun Ahram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faisal KhatibDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Dayana JibrinSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Joud Al-MajaliSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Mira ElhussieniSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Sharifeh AlmasaidSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Mamoun AhramDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. m.ahram@ju.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0003-4457-3604
University of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiobanks are considered primary means+ of supporting contemporary research, in order to deliver personalized and precise diagnostics with public acceptance and participation as a cornerstone for their success.

aimsThis study aims to assess knowledge, perception, and attitudes towards biomedical research and biobanking among students at the University of Jordan. METHODOLOGY: An online questionnaire was designed, developed, and piloted. It was divided into 5 sections that included questions related to issues of biomedical research and biobanking as well as factors influencing the decision to participate.

resultsResponses from 435 students revealed that 52.9% previously heard of biobanks. There was an overwhelming acceptance for participation in biomedical, genetic, and biobanking research. A blood sample was the most preferred for donation. Protection of privacy, informed consent prior to donation, approval of an ethics committee, and trust towards researchers were the most important factors associated with willingness to participate. On the other hand, the vagueness of the type of research performed on the biospecimens and the unavailability of general research results to the donor had a negative connotation. There was no clear agreement on the type of informed consent preferred by students, but to be contacted and informed of research results was preferred by the majority. Students also preferred the disposal of biospecimens and information when deciding to withdraw from participation.

conclusionThere is strong enthusiasm among students to participate in biomedical research and biobanking with all rights reserved thus providing hope for a very promising future in Jordan.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchHumansInformed ConsentJordanStudentsUniversitiesBiobankingBiomedical researchGenetic ResearchInformed consent, Medical schoolJordanPrivacyResearch participationUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID34774033
PMCPMC8590123
OpenAlexW3138968561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.