Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773921›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with or without burn treated with or without continuous veno-venous haemofiltration.

Daniel J Selig, Kevin S Akers, Kevin K Chung, Kaitlin A Pruskowski, Jeffrey R Livezey, Elaine D Por

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J SeligWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Experimental Therapeutics, Silver Spring, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-5984
Kevin S AkersClinical Research Support Division, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Kevin K ChungUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Kaitlin A PruskowskiClinical Research Support Division, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Jeffrey R LivezeyUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Elaine D PorWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Experimental Therapeutics, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere burn injury involves widespread skin and tissue damage leading to systemic inflammation, hypermetabolism and multi-organ failure. The hypermetabolic phase of burn injury has been associated with increased systemic antibiotic clearance; however, critical illness in the absence of burn may also induce similar physiologic changes. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often implemented in critically ill patients and may also affect antibiotic clearance. Although the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem has been described in both the burn and non-burn critically ill populations, direct comparative data is lacking.

methodsFor this study, we evaluated PK parameters of meropenem from 23 critically ill patients, burn or non-burn, treated with or without continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) to determine the contribution of burn and CVVH to the variability of therapeutic meropenem levels.

resultsA two-compartment model best described the data and revealed creatinine clearance (CrCl) and total burn surface area (TBSA) as significant covariates on clearance (CL) and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp), respectively. Of interest, non-burn patients on CVVH displayed an overall lower inherent CL as compared to burn patients on CVVH (6.43 vs. 12.85 L/h). Probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations revealed augmented renal clearance (ARC) may necessitate dose adjustments, but TBSA and CVVH would not.

conclusionsWe recommend a standard dose of 1000 mg every 8 hours; however, if ARC is suspected, or the severity of illness requires a more stringent therapeutic target, we recommend a loading dose of 1000-2000 mg infused over 30 minutes to 1 hour followed by continuous infusion (3000-6000 mg over 24 hours), or intermittent infusion of 2000 mg every 8 hours.

Indexed as

BurnsContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyRenal InsufficiencyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessHumansMeropenemAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemburnscontinuous renal replacement therapycritical illnessmeropenempharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID34773921
PMCPMC9299819
OpenAlexW3213670246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.