ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2022
Bioinks and Bioprinting Strategies for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.
Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered decellularized muscle extracellular matrix fabrics enable functional volumetric muscle loss repair.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Bioprinted vascularized soft-tissue flaps with an integrated arterial-venous loop.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Hydrogels for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Design, Fabrication, and Future Applications.ACS polymers Au · 2026Review
- Pre-priming cell sheet therapy enabled by dynamic wrinkled electroactive substrate for muscle reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Multifunctional scaffold based on TiMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Multi-Component 3D Bioprinted Platform with Sacrificial Matrix and Collagen-Based Bioinks for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2026Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Engineered Tissue Constructs: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anisotropic mechanotransductive tissue constructsBioactive materials · 2026Article
- Conductive MXene/adECM hydrogel promotes skeletal muscle regeneration and innervation through CaJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Cell encapsulated biomaterials for translational medicine.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- 4D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Bio-Inspired Applications for Dynamic Tissue Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- In situ mechanostimulation of biohybrid millirobots for enhanced cell functionality and delivery.Science advances · 2026Article
- Innovations in skeletal muscle regeneration: from physiology to bioengineering approaches for repair and restoration.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Advanced cell-adaptable hydrogels for bioprinting.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Multi-scale biomimetic fusion construction of cerium ion hydrogel-scaffold for promoting osteoporotic bone defect repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Filamented Light (FLight) Bioprinting of Mini-Muscles with Self-Renewal Potential.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- The role of 3D printing in skeletal muscle-on-a-chip models: Current applications and future potential.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Cell and tissue reprogramming: Unlocking a new era in medical drug discovery.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
- Extracellular Matrix-Mediated Crosslinking of Adhesive Hyaluronic Acid Patch for Treating Volumetric Muscle Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscles play important roles in critical body functions and their injury or disease can lead to limitation of mobility and loss of independence. Current treatments result in variable functional recovery, while reconstructive surgery, as the gold-standard approach, is limited due to donor shortage, donor-site morbidity, and limited functional recovery. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering (SMTE) has generated enthusiasm as an alternative solution for treatment of injured tissue and serves as a functional disease model. Recently, bioprinting has emerged as a promising tool for recapitulating the complex and highly organized architecture of skeletal muscles at clinically relevant sizes. Here, skeletal muscle physiology, muscle regeneration following injury, and current treatments following muscle loss are discussed, and then bioprinting strategies implemented for SMTE are critically reviewed. Subsequently, recent advancements that have led to improvement of bioprinting strategies to construct large muscle structures, boost myogenesis in vitro and in vivo, and enhance tissue integration are discussed. Bioinks for muscle bioprinting, as an essential part of any bioprinting strategy, are discussed, and their benefits, limitations, and areas to be improved are highlighted. Finally, the directions the field should expand to make bioprinting strategies more translational and overcome the clinical unmet needs are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.