Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773595›Full record

SynthesisJournal of endocrinological investigation2022

Predictors of disease recurrence after curative surgery for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PanNENs): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

V Andreasi, C Ricci, S Partelli, G Guarneri, C Ingaldi, F Muffatti, S Crippa, R Casadei, M Falconi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V Andreasi *Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
C Ricci *Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
S PartelliPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. partelli.stefano@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-6170
G GuarneriPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
C IngaldiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
F MuffattiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
S CrippaPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
R Casadei *Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M Falconi *Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients submitted to curative surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PanNENs) exhibit a variable risk of disease relapse. Aims of this meta-analysis were to estimate the rate of disease recurrence and to investigate the risk factors for disease relapse in patients submitted to curative surgery for NF-PanNENs.

methodsMedline/Pubmed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. A meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the source of recurrence rate heterogeneity. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to assess the effect of each possible prognostic factor on disease-free survival.

resultsFifteen studies, involving 2754 patients submitted to curative surgery for NF-PanNENs, were included. The pooled rate of disease recurrence was 21% (95% CI 15-26%). Study quality (Odds ratio, OR 0.94, P = 0.016) and G3-PanNENs rate (OR 2.18, P = 0.040) independently predicted the recurrence rate variability. Nodal metastases (HR 1.63, P < 0.001), tumor grade G2-G3 (G1 versus G2: HR 1.72, P < 0.001, G1 versus G3 HR 2.57, P < 0.001), microvascular (HR 1.25, P = 0.046) and perineural (HR 1.29, P = 0.019) invasion were identified as significant prognostic factors. T stage (T1-T2 versus T3-T4, P = 0.253) and status of resection margins (R0 versus R1, P = 0.173) did not show any significant relationship with NF-PanNENs recurrence.

conclusionDisease relapse occurs in approximately one out of five patients submitted to curative surgery for NF-PanNENs. Nodal involvement, tumor grade, microvascular and perineural invasion are relevant prognostic factors, that should be taken into account for follow-up and for possible trials investigating adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments.

Indexed as

RecurrenceCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineHumansOdds RatioPancreatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsCurative surgeryNonfunctioningPancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasmsPrognostic factorsRecurrenceRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34773595
OpenAlexW3213176580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.