Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773573›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Assessing fatigue in children and adolescents: Psychometric validation of the German version of the PROMIS

Ariane Sommer, Susanne Grothus, Kamila Grochowska, Benedikt B Claus, Lorin Stahlschmidt, Julia Wager

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ariane SommerGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany. a.sommer@deutsches-kinderschmerzzentrum.de.
Susanne GrothusGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany.
Kamila GrochowskaGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany.
Benedikt B ClausGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany.
Lorin StahlschmidtGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany.
Julia WagerGerman Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital, Dr.-Friedrich-Steiner-Str. 5, 45711, Datteln, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEGerman Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology · DEVestische Caritas-Kliniken · DE

Funding

Joint Federal Committee Innovation Fund 01VSF18020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFatigue is a common symptom in children and adolescents. Its negative impact on health outcomes is even more pronounced in those with chronic pain. There is currently no fatigue measurement tool in German that is validated for both children and adolescents with and without chronic pain. Therefore, this study aimed to gather quantitative validity evidence to support the use of the German version of the PROMIS

methodsThe 10-item self-assessment questionnaire was validated in a sample of N = 1348 school children (9-18 years; 52.4% female) and N = 114 pediatric chronic pain patients (8-17 years; 63.3% female). Construct and convergent validity, reliability, and item and scale characteristics were examined.

resultsConfirmatory factor analyses showed sufficient model fit for the 1-factor model of the questionnaire (school sample: CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.10, SRMR = 0.04; patient sample: CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.14, SRMR = 0.05). Convergent validity was supported by weak-to-large significant correlations with sleep quality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and pain characteristics. The questionnaire had excellent internal consistency in both samples (α = 0.92 and α = 0.93). Sex differences and age distributions of the PROMIS

conclusionThe PROMIS

Indexed as

Chronic PainQuality of LifeAdolescentChildFatigueFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildren and adolescentsChronic painFatiguePROMIS®QuestionnaireValidation

Identifiers

PMID34773573
PMCPMC8960656
OpenAlexW3211376761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.