Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773504›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2022

Does the roof type of a house influence the presence of adult Anopheles stephensi, urban malaria vector? - evidence from a few slum settings in Chennai, India.

Sangamithra Ravishankaran, Aswin Asokan, N A Johnson Amala Justin, Shalu Thomas, Vasna Joshua, Manu Thomas Mathai, Alex Eapen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suppressive, Curative, and Prophylactic Effects ofBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sangamithra RavishankaranICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, NIE Campus, 2nd Main Road, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 077, India.
Aswin AsokanICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, NIE Campus, 2nd Main Road, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 077, India.
N A Johnson Amala JustinRegional Office for Health and Family Welfare, A-2A, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 090, India.
Shalu ThomasICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, NIE Campus, 2nd Main Road, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 077, India.
Vasna JoshuaICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, 2nd Main Road, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 077, India.
Manu Thomas MathaiDepartment of Zoology, Madras Christian College, Tambaram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 059, India.
Alex EapenICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, NIE Campus, 2nd Main Road, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 077, India. alexeapen@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2511-2557

Funding

Using Next-Generation Genomics to Study Antimalarial Drug Resistance in IndiaU19AI089676 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARLTON, JANE M · 2010 to 2023
$22.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an urban setting, it is a difficult task to collect adult Anopheles stephensi, unlike the immature stages, due to various reasons. A longitudinal study was undertaken from January 2016 to April 2017, with CDC light traps to collect adult Anopheles stephensi and other mosquito species in houses located in a few slums of Chennai, India. A total of 203 trap collections were made indoors from human dwellings having different roof types, as well as outdoors. Three to four trap collections were made at night (18:00 to 06:00 h) once a week. Overall, Culex quinquefasciatus (64%) was the predominant mosquito species captured, followed by An. stephensi (24%). In 98 of the 203 trap collections (48.3%), at least one female An. stephensi was trapped. In all, 224 female An. stephensi were trapped, of which the majority were collected during monsoon and winter seasons. Compared to outdoors, 10% more An. stephensi, the majority of them unfed, were collected indoors, with relatively more contribution coming from asbestos-roofed houses (71.4%), followed by thatched-roof houses (47.3%). Overall, 2.2% positivity for Plasmodium vivax was detected in An. stephensi through Circumsporozoite-ELISA. Binary logistic regression model indicated that season (winter and monsoon), asbestos-roofed dwelling, lesser number of rooms in a house, and more members in a family were significant predictor variables for the odds of trapping an An. stephensi. The study brought out significant factors associated with the presence of An. stephensi in urban slums setting in Chennai, where malaria is declining. The findings would help in devising targeted, effective vector control interventions for malaria elimination in urban settings.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaAnimalsFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMosquito VectorsPoverty AreasAnopheles stephensiCDC light trapHouse roof typeMalaria vectorUrban slumVector incrimination

Identifiers

PMID34773504
PMCPMC8995298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.