Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773503›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2022

Generalized neural field theory of cortical plasticity illustrated by an application to the linear phase of ocular dominance column formation in primary visual cortex.

M M Aghili Yajadda, P A Robinson, J A Henderson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M M Aghili YajaddaSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
P A RobinsonSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
J A HendersonSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. james.henderson@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-9973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically based neural field theory (NFT) is extended to encompass cortical plasticity dynamics. An illustrative application is provided which treats the evolution of the connectivity of left- and right-eye visual stimuli to neuronal populations in the primary visual cortex (V1), and the initial, linear phase of formation of approximately one-dimensional (1D) ocular dominance columns (ODCs) that sets their transverse spatial scale. This links V1 activity, structure, and physiology within a single theory that already accounts for a range of other brain activity and connectivity phenomena, thereby enabling ODC formation and many other phenomena to be interrelated and cortical parameters to be constrained across multiple domains. The results accord with experimental ODC widths for realistic cortical parameters and are based directly on a unified description of the neuronal populations involved, their connection strengths, and the neuronal activity they support. Other key results include simple analytic approximations for ODC widths and the parameters of maximum growth rate, constraints on cortical excitatory and inhibitory gains, elucidation of the roles of specific poles of the V1 response function, and the fact that ODCs are not formed when input stimuli are fully correlated between eyes. This work provides a basis for further generalization of NFT to model other plasticity phenomena, thereby linking them to the range multiscale phenomena accounted for by NFT.

Indexed as

Dominance, OcularVisual CortexNeuronal PlasticityPrimary Visual CortexNeural field theoryOcular dominance columnsPlasticityPrimary visual cortex

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.