Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773491›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Diametrical modulation of tactile and visual perceptual thresholds during the rubber hand illusion: a predictive coding account.

Alice Rossi Sebastiano, Valentina Bruno, Irene Ronga, Carlotta Fossataro, Mattia Galigani, Marco Neppi-Modona, Francesca Garbarini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatially incompatible tool use does not induce tactile neglect.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice Rossi SebastianoMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Valentina BrunoMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Irene RongaMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Carlotta FossataroMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Mattia GaliganiMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Marco Neppi-ModonaMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Francesca GarbariniMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy. francesca.garbarini@unito.it.

Funding

Compagnia di San Paolo CSTO165140Fundação Bial 311/2020Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca RBSI146V1D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the rubber hand illusion (RHI), the synchronous stroking of the participants' concealed hand and a visible rubber hand induces a conflict among visuo-tactile inputs, leading healthy subjects to perceive the illusion of being touched on the rubber hand, as if it were part of their body. The predictive coding theory suggests that the RHI emerges to settle the conflict, attenuating somatosensory inputs in favour of visual ones, which "capture" tactile sensations. Here, we employed the psychophysical measure of perceptual threshold to measure a behavioural correlate of the somatosensory and visual modulations, to better understand the mechanisms underpinning the illusion. Before and after the RHI, participants underwent a tactile (Experiment 1) and a visual (Experiment 2) task, wherein they had to detect stimuli slightly above the perceptual threshold. According to the predictive coding framework, we found a significant decrease of tactile detection (i.e. increased tactile perceptual threshold) and a significant increase of visual detection (i.e.  decreased visual perceptual threshold), suggesting a diametrical modulation of somatosensory and visual perceptual processes. These findings provide evidence of how our system plastically adapts to uncertainty, attributing different weights to sensory inputs to restore a coherent representation of the own body.

Indexed as

IllusionsTouch PerceptionBody ImageHandHumansProprioceptionTouchVisual Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.