Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773482›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2022

LncRNAs in domesticated animals: from dog to livestock species.

Sandrine Lagarrigue, Matthias Lorthiois, Fabien Degalez, David Gilot, Thomas Derrien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandrine LagarrigueINRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France. sandrine.lagarrigue@agrocampus-ouest.fr.
Matthias LorthioisUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes) - UMR 6290, 2 av Prof Leon Bernard, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Fabien DegalezINRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
David GilotCLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, Université Rennes, UMR_S 1242, 35000, Rennes, France.
Thomas DerrienUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes) - UMR 6290, 2 av Prof Leon Bernard, F-35000, Rennes, France. thomas.derrien@univ-rennes1.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8211-5789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal genomes are pervasively transcribed into multiple RNA molecules, of which many will not be translated into proteins. One major component of this transcribed non-coding genome is the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides with low coding-potential capabilities. Domestic animals constitute a unique resource for studying the genetic and epigenetic basis of phenotypic variations involving protein-coding and non-coding RNAs, such as lncRNAs. This review presents the current knowledge regarding transcriptome-based catalogues of lncRNAs in major domesticated animals (pets and livestock species), covering a broad phylogenetic scale (from dogs to chicken), and in comparison with human and mouse lncRNA catalogues. Furthermore, we describe different methods to extract known or discover novel lncRNAs and explore comparative genomics approaches to strengthen the annotation of lncRNAs. We then detail different strategies contributing to a better understanding of lncRNA functions, from genetic studies such as GWAS to molecular biology experiments and give some case examples in domestic animals. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current lncRNA annotations and suggest research directions to improve them and their functional characterisation.

Indexed as

RNA, Long NoncodingAnimalsAnimals, DomesticDogsGenomeLivestockMicePhylogenyTranscriptomeRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID34773482
PMCPMC9114084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.