ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
Personalized application of machine learning algorithms to identify pediatric patients at risk for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after dismembered pyeloplasty.
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pyeloplasty outcomes in children with complex anatomy: an observational series of reconstruction in concurrent ureterovesical obstruction, duplex, malrotated or ectopic moieties and horseshoe kidneys.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Observational
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting kidney failure among CAKUT children in multicenter large-scale study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing outcomes and accelerating learning curves in open pyeloplasty.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- Longitudinal image-based prediction of surgical intervention in infants with hydronephrosis using deep learning: Is a single ultrasound enough?PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Use of prenatal ultrasound findings to predict postnatal outcome in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024Article
- Current advances in the use of artificial intelligence in predicting and managing urological complications.International urology and nephrology · 2024Review
- Bioinformatics in urology - molecular characterization of pathophysiology and response to treatment.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- The construction of a nomogram to predict the prognosis and recurrence risks of UPJO.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Attaining competency and proficiency in open pyeloplasty: a learning curve configuration using cumulative sum analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a model that predicts whether a child will develop a recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty, determine their survival risk score, and expected time to re-intervention using machine learning (ML).
methodsWe reviewed patients undergoing pyeloplasty from 2008 to 2020 at our institution, including all children and adolescents younger than 18 years. We developed a two-stage machine learning model from 34 clinical fields, which included patient characteristics, ultrasound findings, and anatomical variation. We fit and trained with a logistic lasso model for binary cure model and subsequent survival model. Feature importance on the model was determined with post-selection inference. Performance metrics included area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (AUROC), concordance, and leave-one-out cross validation.
resultsA total of 543 patients were identified, with a median preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior diameter of 23 and 10 mm, respectively. 39 of 232 patients included in the survival model required re-intervention. The cure and survival models performed well with a leave-one-out cross validation AUROC and concordance of 0.86 and 0.78, respectively. Post-selective inference showed that larger anteroposterior diameter at the second post-op follow-up, and anatomical variation in the form of concurrent anomalies were significant model features predicting negative outcomes. The model can be used at https://sickkidsurology.shinyapps.io/PyeloplastyReOpRisk/ .
conclusionOur ML-based model performed well in predicting the risk of and time to re-intervention after pyeloplasty. The implementation of this ML-based approach is novel in pediatric urology and will likely help achieve personalized risk stratification for patients undergoing pyeloplasty. Further real-world validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.