Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773342›Full record

ArticleCancer science2022

PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression status in relation to chemotherapy in primary and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Kazuo Okadome, Yoshifumi Baba, Noriko Yasuda-Yoshihara, Daichi Nomoto, Taisuke Yagi, Tasuku Toihata, Katsuhiro Ogawa, Hiroshi Sawayama, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Masaaki Iwatsuki and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuo OkadomeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoshifumi BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-2388
Noriko Yasuda-YoshiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Daichi NomotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Taisuke YagiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tasuku ToihataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Katsuhiro OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hiroshi SawayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takatsugu IshimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-1835
Masaaki IwatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Shiro IwagamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yuji MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Naoya YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masayuki WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KomoharaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-0846
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2550
Kumamoto University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 17H04273JSPS KAKENHI 17K19702JSPS KAKENHI 17KK0195JSPS KAKENHI 21K16452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in various cancers. Although programmed death ligand 1/2 (PD-L1/L2) expressions have been demonstrated as predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and prognostic markers, whether PD-L1/L2 expression is altered in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during the therapeutic course is unclear. Whether PD-L1/L2 expression in metastatic or recurrent lesions is consistent with that in primary tumors is also unknown. This study included 561 surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and PD-L1/L2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the influence of chemotherapeutic drugs (cisplatin and fluorouracil) on PD-L1/L2 expression and PD-L1/L2-related pathways in vitro. We also examined PD-L1/L2 expression in 18 surgically resected lymph node metastases and 10 recurrent lesions compared with primary lesions. The positive rate of PD-L1 was significantly higher in patients with preoperative chemotherapy than in those without preoperative therapy. The positive rate of PD-L2 expression showed no significant difference between patient groups. Cisplatin increased PD-L1 expression in cancer cell lines in vitro, but decreased PD-L2 in some cell lines. The effects of cisplatin on phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/3 (pSTAT1/3) also differed depending on cell lines. Fluorouracil increased PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. PD-L1/L2 expression in lymph node metastases and recurrent lesions did not always match expression in primary lesions. PD-L1/L2 expression may be altered by preoperative chemotherapy, and PD-L1 /L2 expression in primary lesions does not always match that of metastatic/recurrent lesions. Thus, one-time evaluation is not sufficient to evaluate PD-L1/L2 expression as a biomarker in esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCisplatinEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFluorouracilHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanCisplatinFluorouracilPDCD1LG2 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Proteinchemotherapyesophageal cancermetastasisPD-L1PD-L2

Identifiers

PMID34773342
PMCPMC8819296
OpenAlexW3211469814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.