Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773182›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2021

Characterization of Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Properties and Prediction of Human PK Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for a Novel Anti-Arrhythmic Agent Sulcardine Sulfate.

Chang Ren, Yao Wang, Mei Zhang, Dexuan Kong, Chen Ning, Yujie Cheng, Yueying Bian, Mengqi Sun, Shengdi Su, Yucong Wang and 5 more

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang RenClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yao WangClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Mei ZhangClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Dexuan KongClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Chen NingClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yujie ChengClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yueying BianClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Mengqi SunClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Shengdi SuClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yucong WangClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yongjie ZhangClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Yang LuClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Ning LiNational Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Di ZhaoClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China. zh_d99@cpu.edu.cn.
Xijing ChenClinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, #639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, China. chenxj-lab@hotmail.com.
China Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSulcardine sulfate (Sul) is a novel antiarrhythmic agent with promising pharmacological properties, which is currently being evaluated in several clinical trials as an oral formulation. To meet the medication needs of patients with acute conditions, the injection formulation of Sul has been developed. The objective of this study was to systemically investigate the pharmacokinetic profiles of Sul after intravenous infusion.

methodsThis research included the plasma protein binding and metabolic stability studies in vitro, plasma pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, excretion studies in animals, and the prediction of the clinical PK of Sul injection using a physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) model.

resultsThe metabolic stability was similarly in dogs and humans but lower in rats. The plasma protein binding rates showed a concentration-dependent manner and species differences. The pharmacokinetic behavior after intravenous administration was linear in rats within the dose range of 30-90 mg/kg, but nonlinear in dogs within 30-60 mg/kg. Sul could be rapidly and widely distributed in multiple tissues after intravenous administration. About 12% of the parent compound were excreted via the urine and only a small fraction via bile and feces,and eight metabolites were found and identified in the rat excretion. The PBPK models were developed and simulated the observed PK date well in both rats and dogs. The PBPK model refined with human data predicted the PK characteristics of the first intravenous infusion of Sul in human.

conclusionsOur study systematically explored the pharmacokinetic characteristics of Sul and successfully developed the PBPK model to predict of its clinical PK.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleHepatobiliary EliminationHumansInfusions, IntravenousInjections, IntravenousIntestinal EliminationMaleMicrosomes, LiverRatsRenal EliminationSulfuric Acid EstersAnti-Arrhythmia Agentssulcardine sulfateSulfuric Acid Estersmetabolitespharmacokineticsphysiologically based pharmacokinetic modelSulcardine sulfate

Identifiers

PMID34773182
OpenAlexW3212117736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.