ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
An efficient strategy for predicting river dissolved oxygen concentration: application of deep recurrent neural network model.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long short-term memory models of water quality in inland water environments.Water research X · 2023Review
- Machine learning algorithm as a sustainable tool for dissolved oxygen prediction: a case study of Feitsui Reservoir, Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in water is one of the key parameters for assessing river water quality. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have previously proved to be accurate tools for DO concentration prediction. This study presents the implementation of a deep learning approach applied to a recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm. The proposed deep recurrent neural network (DRNN) model is compared with support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, formerly shown to be robust AI algorithms. The Fanno Creek in Oregon (USA) is selected as a case study and daily values of water temperature, specific conductance, streamflow discharge, pH, and DO concentration are used as input variables to predict DO concentration for three different lead times ("t + 1," "t + 3," and "t + 7"). Based on Pearson's correlation coefficient, several input variable combinations are formed and used for prediction. The model prediction performance is evaluated using various indices such as correlation coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, root mean square error, and mean absolute error. The results identify the DRNN model ([Formula: see text]) as the most accurate among the three models considered, highlighting the potential of deep learning approaches for water quality parameter prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34773156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.