ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021
Comparison of bacterial community profiles from large intestine specimens, rectal swabs, and stool samples.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota in patients in the intensive care unit using different sampling methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Novel Microbial Engraftment Trajectories Following Microbiota Transplant Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2025Trial
- Altered microbial cargo in fecal microbiome-derived outer membrane vesicles as novel biomarkers for vascular dementia.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Metagenomic analysis reveals rectal microbiota features associated with HIV and behavioral factors in Nigerian men who have sex with men.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tissue source may affect the esophageal flora in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease exhibits sex-specific microbial heterogeneity within intestinal compartments.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Article
- Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.PeerJ · 2025Review
- Exploring human milk oligosaccharides: mechanisms linking gut function to cognitive development in human and pig physiology.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Diversity of the microbiota communities found in the various regions of the intestinal tract in healthy individuals and inflammatory bowel diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Role of microbes in colorectal cancer therapy: Cross-talk between the microbiome and tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human gastrointestinal tract contains a complex and dynamic population of microorganisms, known as the gut microbiota. Although interest in the role of the gut microbiota in human health has increased in recent years, there remains no standard sampling protocol for analyzing these organisms. Here, we aimed to characterize the microbial composition of distinct segments of the large intestine and to determine whether rectal swabs are suitable for identifying colon microbiota. A total of 100 participants who underwent screening colonoscopy from October 2019 to October 2020 were included in this study. Large intestinal samples (ascending colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) were aspirated by colonoscopy. Rectal swabs were collected before colonoscopy, and stool samples were collected before patients began colonoscopy preparation. All samples were subjected to 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We identified differences in the number of phylum-level operational taxonomic units among large intestinal samples, rectal swabs, and stool. Five major phyla were detected in all samples (Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria), although their relative abundances varied. Notably, we found that the microbial compositions of rectal swabs were most similar to those of the sigmoid colon and rectum, whereas the microbiota in stool were relatively different than those from the large intestine and rectal swabs. Our results reveal the existence of microbial heterogeneity within different large intestinal compartments and further suggest that rectal swabs are an acceptable and practical tool for gut microbiota analysis. KEY POINTS: • Our findings highlight local microbiome variations within different regions of the large intestine. • Stool samples do not appear to fully recapitulate the gut microbiome. • Our data from a large population-based cohort indicate that rectal swabs can be used to study the gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.