Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773153›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Comparison of bacterial community profiles from large intestine specimens, rectal swabs, and stool samples.

Yu-Jin Kwon, Hwan Jong Kwak, Hyung Ki Lee, Hyun Chul Lim, Dong-Hyuk Jung

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Jin KwonDepartment of Family Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 363, Dongbaekjukjeon-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, Republic of Korea.
Hwan Jong KwakMediCloud Corp, 77, Changnyoung-daero 256beon-gil, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, , Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Ki LeeMediCloud Corp, 77, Changnyoung-daero 256beon-gil, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, , Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Chul LimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 363, Dongbaekjukjeon-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, Republic of Korea. MDLHC97@yuhs.ac.
Dong-Hyuk JungDepartment of Family Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 363, Dongbaekjukjeon-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, Republic of Korea. balsan2@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-0676
Yonsei University · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gastrointestinal tract contains a complex and dynamic population of microorganisms, known as the gut microbiota. Although interest in the role of the gut microbiota in human health has increased in recent years, there remains no standard sampling protocol for analyzing these organisms. Here, we aimed to characterize the microbial composition of distinct segments of the large intestine and to determine whether rectal swabs are suitable for identifying colon microbiota. A total of 100 participants who underwent screening colonoscopy from October 2019 to October 2020 were included in this study. Large intestinal samples (ascending colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) were aspirated by colonoscopy. Rectal swabs were collected before colonoscopy, and stool samples were collected before patients began colonoscopy preparation. All samples were subjected to 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We identified differences in the number of phylum-level operational taxonomic units among large intestinal samples, rectal swabs, and stool. Five major phyla were detected in all samples (Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria), although their relative abundances varied. Notably, we found that the microbial compositions of rectal swabs were most similar to those of the sigmoid colon and rectum, whereas the microbiota in stool were relatively different than those from the large intestine and rectal swabs. Our results reveal the existence of microbial heterogeneity within different large intestinal compartments and further suggest that rectal swabs are an acceptable and practical tool for gut microbiota analysis. KEY POINTS: • Our findings highlight local microbiome variations within different regions of the large intestine. • Stool samples do not appear to fully recapitulate the gut microbiome. • Our data from a large population-based cohort indicate that rectal swabs can be used to study the gut microbiome.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBacteriaFecesHumansRectumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S metagenomics analysisColonGut microbiomeRectal swabStool

Identifiers

PMID34773153
OpenAlexW3214511198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.