ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2022
Risk factors affecting vertebral collapse and kyphotic progression in postmenopausal osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What Factors Contribute to the Poor Prognosis of Conservative Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture (OVCF): A Systematic Review.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Pooled it
- The Elusive Concept of Stability in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Interleukin Concentrations in Bone Marrow Fluid and MRI Prognostic Findings in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.Cureus · 2025Article
- Compression Rate Progression of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture in Conservative Treatments.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Impact of Paravertebral Muscle Degeneration on Residual Low Back Pain Following Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
- Risk factors for secondary vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a single-centre retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Article
- Progression of vertebral deformity of prevalent vertebral fractures in the elderly: a population-based study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Vertebral compression fractures managed with brace: risk factors for progression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to investigate the risk factors that affect vertebral deformity 6 months after osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) at the time of injury. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom May 2017 to May 2020, 70 postmenopausal women with OVFs were evaluated for age; body mass index; number of previous OVFs; total 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels; posterior wall injury on computed tomography; cross-sectional area (CSA) of the psoas major, erector spinae, and multifidus; fat infiltration; vertebral instability (VI) upon admission; collapse rate (CR); and kyphotic angle (KA) at 6 months after injury. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for the CR and KA.
resultsThe CR was correlated with posterior wall injury (r = 0.295, p = 0.022), 25(OH)D levels (r = - 0.367, p = 0.002), and VI (r = 0.307, p = 0.010). In the multiple regression analysis, the 25(OH)D levels (p = 0.032) and VI (p = 0.035) were significant risk factors for the CR at the 6-month follow-up. The KA was correlated with the 25(OH)D levels (r = - 0.262, p = 0.031) and VI (r = 0.298, p = 0.012). In the multiple regression analysis, the CSA of the psoas major (p = 0.011) and VI (p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for the KA at the 6-month follow-up.
conclusionIn cases with large VI at the time of injury, the CR and KA were significantly higher at 6 months after injury. Moreover, the CR was affected by the 25(OH)D level, while the KA was affected by the CSA of the psoas major upon admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34773152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.