Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773144›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Micelle to cyclodextrin stacking in open-tubular liquid chromatography using capillaries coated with surfactant admicelles.

Mohamed Adel Ahmed, Joselito P Quirino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed Adel AhmedAustralian Centre for Research On Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Natural Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Joselito P QuirinoAustralian Centre for Research On Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Natural Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. jquirino@utas.edu.au.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council 2018Australian Research Council DP180102810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-line sample concentration by micelle to cyclodextrin stacking (MCDS) in open-tubular liquid chromatography (OT-LC) with UV detection is described. OT-LC of two sets of analytes (small-molecule drugs and neutral alkenylbenzenes) was by the use of a fused-silica capillary that was coated with admicelles of didodecyldimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB). These admicelles acted as a stationary chromatographic pseudophase. The mobile phase was 25 mM sodium tetraborate in 10% methanol, pH 9.2. MCDS was by long pressure injection of samples prepared in 10 mM hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) in 25 mM sodium tetraborate, pH 9.2 (buffer), followed by injection of 50 mM α-CD in buffer (CD solution). Stacking was by application of voltage at -20 kV prior to pressure-driven OT-LC. The factors that influenced MCDS such as type and concentration of CD, concentration of CTAB in the sample, injection time ratio of the sample and the CD solution and stacking time were studied. Under optimised conditions, sensitivity enhancement factors (SEFs) were between 19 and 23, linear ranges were between 0.5 and 10 µg/mL with r

Indexed as

Capillary electrochromatographyCapillary electrophoresisCyclodextrinsMicellesOpen-tubular liquid chromatographyStacking

Identifiers

PMID34773144
OpenAlexW3214267198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.