Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Acute postoperative pain in 23 procedures of gynaecological surgery analysed in a prospective open registry study on risk factors and consequences for the patient.

Jorge Jiménez Cruz, Angela Kather, Kristin Nicolaus, Matthias Rengsberger, Anke R Mothes, Ekkehard Schleussner, Winfried Meissner, Ingo B Runnebaum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge Jiménez CruzDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Angela KatherDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Kristin NicolausDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Matthias RengsbergerDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Anke R MothesDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ekkehard SchleussnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Winfried MeissnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ingo B RunnebaumDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. ingo.runnebaum@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective perioperative pain management is essential for optimal patient recovery after surgery and reduces the risk of chronification. However, in clinical practice, perioperative analgesic treatment still needs to be improved and data availability for evidence-based procedure specific analgesic recommendations is insufficient. We aimed to identify procedures related with high pain scores, to evaluate the effect of higher pain intensity on patients and to define patient and intervention related risk factors for increased pain after standard gynaecological and obstetrical surgery. Therefore, we performed a prospective cross-sectional study based on the German registry for quality in postoperative pain (QUIPS). A cohort of 2508 patients receiving surgery between January 2011 and February 2016 in our tertiary referral centre (university departments of gynaecology and obstetrics, respectively) answered a validated pain questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Maximal pain intensity was measured by means of a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and related to procedure, perioperative care as well as patient characteristics. The interventions with the highest reported pain scores were laparoscopic removal of ovarian cysts (NRS of 6.41 ± 2.12) and caesarean section (NRS of 6.98 ± 2.08). Factors associated with higher pain intensity were younger age (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.65-1.99), chronic pain (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.64) and surgery performed outside the regular day shift (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.09-2.36). Shorter duration of surgery, peridural or local analgesic and preoperative sedation reduced postoperative pain. Patients reporting high pain scores (NRS ≥ 5) showed relevant impairment of daily activities and reduced satisfaction. Caesarean section and minimal invasive procedures were associated with the highest pain scores in the present ranking. Pain management of these procedures has to be reconsidered. Younger age, receiving surgery outside of the regular shifts, chronic pain and the surgical approach itself have a relevant influence on postoperative pain intensity. When reporting pain scores of 5 or more, patients were more likely to have perioperative complications like nausea or vomiting and to be impaired in mobilisation. Registry-based data are useful to identify patients, procedures and critical situations in daily clinical routine, which increase the risk for elevated post-intervention pain. Furthermore, it provides a database for evaluation of new pain management strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAnalgesicsCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedOperative TimeOvarian CystsPain ManagementPain MeasurementAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID34773057
PMCPMC8590005
OpenAlexW3211963545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.