ArticleScientific reports2021
Isolation, phenotypic characterization and comparative genomic analysis of 2019SD1, a polyvalent enterobacteria phage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Characterization and genomic analysis of DSF2: a novel lytic phage infecting multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Amino acid residues in the tail fiber differentiate the host specificity ofJournal of virology · 2025Article
- Characterization of a novel phage against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Isolation and preliminary characterization of a novel bacteriophage vB_KquU_φKuK6 that infects the multidrug-resistant pathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Characteristics of a novel temperate bacteriophage against Staphylococcus arlettae (vB_SarS_BM31).International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Topically applied bacteriophage to control multi-drug resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shigella has the remarkable capability to acquire antibiotic resistance rapidly thereby posing a significant public health challenge for the effective treatment of dysentery (Shigellosis). The phage therapy has been proven as an effective alternative strategy for controlling Shigella infections. In this study, we illustrate the isolation and detailed characterization of a polyvalent phage 2019SD1, which demonstrates lytic activity against Shigella dysenteriae, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Enterococcus saccharolyticus and Enterococcus faecium. The newly isolated phage 2019SD1 shows adsorption time < 6 min, a latent period of 20 min and burst size of 151 PFU per bacterial cell. 2019SD1 exhibits considerable stability in a wide pH range and survives an hour at 50 °C. Under transmission electron microscope, 2019SD1 shows an icosahedral capsid (60 nm dia) and a 140 nm long tail. Further, detailed bioinformatic analyses of whole genome sequence data obtained through Oxford Nanopore platform revealed that 2019SD1 belongs to genus Hanrivervirus of subfamily Tempevirinae under the family Drexlerviridae. The concatenated protein phylogeny of 2019SD1 with the members of Drexlerviridae taking four genes (DNA Primase, ATP Dependent DNA Helicase, Large Terminase Protein, and Portal Protein) using the maximum parsimony method also suggested that 2019SD1 formed a distinct clade with the closest match of the taxa belonging to the genus Hanrivervirus. The genome analysis data indicate the occurrence of putative tail fiber proteins and DNA methylation mechanism. In addition, 2019SD1 has a well-established anti-host defence system as suggested through identification of putative anti-CRISPR and anti-restriction endonuclease systems thereby also indicating its biocontrol potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.