Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772461›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2021

Characterization of simulation centers and programs in Latin America according to the ASPIRE and SSH quality criteria.

Soledad Armijo-Rivera, Felipe Machuca-Contreras, Norma Raul, Saionara Nunes de Oliveira, Ismael Ballesteros Mendoza, Héctor Shibao Miyasato, Diego Andrés Díaz-Guio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Soledad Armijo-RiveraNúcleo de Simulación Interdisciplinar, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago Universidad del Desarrollo, Avenida Las Condes 12438 Lo Barnechea, Santiago, Chile. soledad.armijo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-5961
Felipe Machuca-ContrerasUniversidad Autónoma de Chile, Pedro de Valdivia 425, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-8593
Norma RaulClinical Simulation Training Center, Hospital de Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Dr. Néstor Carlos Kirchner, Ministry of Health, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5996-6836
Saionara Nunes de OliveiraDepartment of Nursing, Federal Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-4374
Ismael Ballesteros MendozaSimulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Ejército, 141, Santiago, Chile.
Héctor Shibao MiyasatoSimulation Center, Integrated School of Medicine, Nursing and Dentistry, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8792
Diego Andrés Díaz-GuioEducation and Simulation Research Group, VitalCare Centro de Simulación Clínica, Faculty of Medicine Universidad Alexander von Humboldt, Armenia, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-9870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatin American clinical simulation has had an important development; there are no studies that characterize simulation centers and programs in the entire region. The aims of this work are to characterize the current state of simulation-based education in the health sciences, to determine the structure of Latin American simulation centers in terms of teaching, research, and continuing medical education (CME), as well as to determine the perception of quality based on international standards of simulation practices for the directors of Latin American centers.

methodsA quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study with a demographic questionnaire and a Likert-type survey was conducted to the directors of the simulation centers found in Latin America.

resultsFour hundred eight simulation centers were documented, the survey was answered by 240 directors, and the data from 149 were complete responses on the 42 quality self-perception scale and considered valid on further analyses related to the quality of the programs. Most of the centers that responded correspond to Chile, Brazil, and Mexico (37.5%, 18.1%, 12.7%). 84% of the centers are university-based, and 71% of the centers are medium-sized, with less than 10 instructors (54%). The directors are mostly women (61.7%), medical doctors (50%), and nurses (40%), with clinical specialization (37%), master's degree (53%), and doctorate (13%). 75% have completed a simulation instructor course, and 6% have developed a fellowship. Most consider the maintenance of international quality standards to be relevant in their centers, mainly in reflective training techniques, ethical aspects, and adequate learning environments.

conclusionsSimulation-based education in health sciences has had an increasing development in Latin America, within a university environment, in an important academic specialization process that seeks to adhere to high-quality standards to improve training and development of clinical skills, human factors, and critical thinking. We recommend starting accreditation processes in Latin America and studies that measure the quality of simulation-based education in our region, based on objective observations more than in self-reporting.

Indexed as

Health care educationHigh fidelity simulation trainingMedical simulation centersQuality assuranceSimulation training

Identifiers

PMID34772461
PMCPMC8588659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.