Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772369›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Desistance from crime following substance use treatment: the role of treatment retention, social network and self-control.

Ingeborg Skjærvø, Thomas Clausen, Svetlana Skurtveit, Anne Bukten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingeborg SkjærvøNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. ingeborg.skjarvo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-4908
Thomas ClausenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Svetlana SkurtveitNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne BuktenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReductions in crime are often reported following substance use treatment. We explore the relationship between desistance from crime, treatment type, treatment retention and positive changes in known risk factors for crime.

methodsWe used data from the NorComt-study; a longitudinal study of substance users (n = 341) enrolled in comprehensive treatment in Norway (2012-2015). At treatment initiation (T0) and 1 year later (T1), we collected self-reported data on criminal involvement, treatment, substance use, social network and self-control. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with multinomial logistic regression analysis.

resultsOverall, 1 year following treatment initiation 69% reported desistance from crime, 18% reported continued crime and 12% reported no crime at all in the study period. Desistance was high for OMT patients in ongoing treatment (79% desisted) and for inpatients regardless of treatment status (79-93% desisted), while not as high among OMT patients with interrupted treatment (47% desisted). For participants that continued crime during follow-up, the average number of criminal acts per month was reduced (p < 0.001). Desistance at follow-up was associated with being older (aOR: 1.05, CI: 1.00-1.10), inpatient treatment (aOR: 3.71, CI: 1.12-12.29), being in ongoing treatment (inpatient or OMT) (aOR: 2.90, CI: 1.01-8.36), having no stimulant use in the study period (aOR: 4.86, CI: 1.72-13.70), leaving a substance using social network (aOR 2.87, CI: 1.15-7.18) and improvement in self-control score (aOR: 1.08, CI: 1.04-1.13).

conclusionsRetention in treatment is particularly important for crime outcomes among OMT patients. Positive changes in social network and self-control are potential contributors to desistance from crime. Targeted interventions towards crime reduction are recommended for patients with stimulant use, which appears to be a persistent risk factor for crime over time.

Indexed as

Self-ControlSubstance-Related DisordersCrimeHumansLongitudinal StudiesSocial NetworkingAmphetamineCrimeDesistanceOpioid maintenance treatmentSelf-controlSocial networkStimulantsSubstance use treatmentTreatment retention

Identifiers

PMID34772369
PMCPMC8588672
OpenAlexW3211730409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.