Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772348›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

The quality of patients' self-blood pressure measurements: a cross-sectional study.

Katarzyna Nessler, Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka, Anna Suska, Mitchell R Mann, Michał B Nessler, Adam Windak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna NesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland. katarzynanessler@gmail.com.
Anna Krztoń-KrólewieckaDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland.
Anna SuskaDepartment of Family Medicine, Students' Family Medicine Interest Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Mitchell R MannDepartment of Family Medicine, Students' Family Medicine Interest Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Michał B NesslerBurns and Plastic Surgery Centre of Malopolska, Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre of Malopolska, Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Os. Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Kraków, Poland.
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate and independent measurement of blood pressure (BP) by patients is essential for home BP monitoring (HBPM) and determining the quality of hypertension (HTN) control. This study aimed to evaluate the BP self-measurement techniques of hypertensive patients and their accuracy in accordance with established guidelines. We sought to identify the common errors that patients make and suggest improvements that can be implemented in the primary healthcare setting to increase the reliability of HBPM conducted by hypertensive patients.

methodsOne hundred patients diagnosed with HTN completed a questionnaire inquiring about their health and demographic data and BP monitoring practices. Patients were then observed and filmed while measuring their BP on their own devices in five primary healthcare centres in Kraków, Poland. The correctness of their techniques was assessed in accordance with the European Society of Hypertension guidelines on HBPM.

resultsOnly 3% of patients measured their BP without error; 60% made three or more errors. The most frequent error, made by 76% of subjects, was incorrect sphygmomanometer cuff placement (above or below heart level, or/and the indicator mark was not aligned with the brachial artery). Regarding patients' previous instruction for the correct use of their devices, 36% of patients referred to their monitor's user manual, 22% did not receive any prior assistance, and only 29% were adequately counselled by physicians on how to measure their BP correctly.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that primary healthcare physicians and their personnel often do not adequately instruct patients on how to measure their BP correctly. Therefore, healthcare systems must provide patients with more adequate training and reference materials on the best practices of BP monitoring.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatorySelf CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSphygmomanometersSurveys and QuestionnairesHBPMHome blood pressure monitoringHypertension management

Identifiers

PMID34772348
PMCPMC8588592
OpenAlexW3213546366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.