ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021
The quality of patients' self-blood pressure measurements: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond ad hoc home blood pressure monitoring: The need for standardisation and integration into primary care.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Home blood pressure monitoring and mobile health application practices among pregnant persons with and at risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Pregnancy hypertension · 2025Article
- implementation of healthy heart ambassador to improve blood pressure control at community health centers in Texas.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Comparing blood pressure measurements between sitting in chairs and sitting on the floor.Clinical hypertension · 2024Article
- When and how to use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure monitoring for managing hypertension.Clinical hypertension · 2024Review
- Exploration of patients' practices related to home blood pressure monitoring.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Article
- Development and Initial Use of an Evidence-Based Home Blood Pressure Monitoring mHealth Platform.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
- The reliability of patient blood pressure self-assessments - a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2023 Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2023Article
- Current practices and knowledge of home blood pressure monitoring among people with hypertension: Insights from a Multicentric study from North India.Indian heart journalArticle
- Knowledge of Hypertension and Self-Blood Pressure Measurement Skills in Spain.Journal of primary care & community healthObservational
- Exploring the impact of digital care delivery for patients with diabetes and hypertension: A longitudinal qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate and independent measurement of blood pressure (BP) by patients is essential for home BP monitoring (HBPM) and determining the quality of hypertension (HTN) control. This study aimed to evaluate the BP self-measurement techniques of hypertensive patients and their accuracy in accordance with established guidelines. We sought to identify the common errors that patients make and suggest improvements that can be implemented in the primary healthcare setting to increase the reliability of HBPM conducted by hypertensive patients.
methodsOne hundred patients diagnosed with HTN completed a questionnaire inquiring about their health and demographic data and BP monitoring practices. Patients were then observed and filmed while measuring their BP on their own devices in five primary healthcare centres in Kraków, Poland. The correctness of their techniques was assessed in accordance with the European Society of Hypertension guidelines on HBPM.
resultsOnly 3% of patients measured their BP without error; 60% made three or more errors. The most frequent error, made by 76% of subjects, was incorrect sphygmomanometer cuff placement (above or below heart level, or/and the indicator mark was not aligned with the brachial artery). Regarding patients' previous instruction for the correct use of their devices, 36% of patients referred to their monitor's user manual, 22% did not receive any prior assistance, and only 29% were adequately counselled by physicians on how to measure their BP correctly.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that primary healthcare physicians and their personnel often do not adequately instruct patients on how to measure their BP correctly. Therefore, healthcare systems must provide patients with more adequate training and reference materials on the best practices of BP monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.