Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772221›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.

Flavia Iaculli, Alessandro Salucci, Gianni Di Giorgio, Valeria Luzzi, Gaetano Ierardo, Antonella Polimeni, Maurizio Bossù

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composites-Are We Going Somewhere?Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Flavia IaculliDepartment of Neuroscience and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Alessandro SalucciDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Gianni Di GiorgioDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-4072
Valeria LuzziDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Gaetano IerardoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Antonella PolimeniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-7607
Maurizio BossùDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bond strengthdental restorationsglass ionomer cementsprimary teethself-adhesive flowable composites

Identifiers

PMID34772221
PMCPMC8586968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.