ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Custom-Made Titanium Mesh Tray for Mandibular Reconstruction Using an Electron Beam Melting System.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different titanium mesh thicknesses on mechanical strength and bone stress: a finite element study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility Evaluation of an Artificial Metallic Bone with Lattice Structure for Reconstruction of Bone Defect.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigation of the Mechanical Strength of Artificial Metallic Mandibles with Lattice Structure for Mandibular Reconstruction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards Optimum Mandibular Reconstruction for Dental Occlusal Rehabilitation: From Preoperative Virtual Surgery to Autogenous Particulate Cancellous Bone and Marrow Graft with Custom-Made Titanium Mesh-A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium mesh tray and autologous bone is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, there can be material problems-such as broken titanium mesh trays-which may undermine long-term functionality. This study was designed to investigate the optimal conditions for a titanium mesh tray with an ideal mandibular shape and sufficient strength, using computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing technology, and electron beam additive manufacturing. Specimens were prepared using Ti-6Al-4V extra low interstitial titanium alloy powder and an electron beam melting (EBM) system. The mechanical strength of the plate-shaped specimens was examined for differences in the stretch direction with respect to the stacking direction and the presence or absence of surface treatment. While evaluating the mechanical strength of the tray-shaped specimens, the topology was optimized and specimens with a honeycomb structure were also verified. Excellent mechanical strength was observed under the condition that the specimen was stretched vertically in the stacking direction and the surface was treated. The results of the tray-shaped specimens indicated that the thickness was 1.2 mm, the weight reduction rate was 20%, and the addition of a honeycomb structure could withstand an assumed bite force of 2000 N. This study suggests that the EBM system could be a useful technique for preparing custom-made titanium mesh trays of sufficient strength for mandibular reconstruction by arranging various manufacturing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.