Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772040›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

On Random Subspace Optimization-Based Hybrid Computing Models Predicting the California Bearing Ratio of Soils.

Duong Kien Trong, Binh Thai Pham, Fazal E Jalal, Mudassir Iqbal, Panayiotis C Roussis, Anna Mamou, Maria Ferentinou, Dung Quang Vu, Nguyen Duc Dam, Quoc Anh Tran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Duong Kien TrongFaculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Binh Thai PhamFaculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-9707-840X
Fazal E JalalState Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Mudassir IqbalState Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Panayiotis C RoussisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Anna MamouComputational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Heraklion, 14121 Athens, Greece.
Maria FerentinouSchool of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
Dung Quang VuFaculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-7068-9099
Nguyen Duc DamFaculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-9331
Quoc Anh TranDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5987-435X
Panagiotis G AsterisComputational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Heraklion, 14121 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-4981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is an important index for evaluating the bearing capacity of pavement subgrade materials. In this research, random subspace optimization-based hybrid computing models were trained and developed for the prediction of the CBR of soil. Three models were developed, namely reduced error pruning trees (REPTs), random subsurface-based REPT (RSS-REPT), and RSS-based extra tree (RSS-ET). An experimental database was compiled from a total of 214 soil samples, which were classified according to AASHTO M 145, and included 26 samples of A-2-6 (clayey gravel and sand soil), 3 samples of A-4 (silty soil), 89 samples of A-6 (clayey soil), and 96 samples of A-7-6 (clayey soil). All CBR tests were performed in soaked conditions. The input parameters of the models included the particle size distribution, gravel content (G), coarse sand content (CS), fine sand content (FS), silt clay content (SC), organic content (O), liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL), plasticity index (PI), optimum moisture content (OMC), and maximum dry density (MDD). The accuracy of the developed models was assessed using numerous performance indexes, such as the coefficient of determination, relative error, MAE, and RMSE. The results show that the highest prediction accuracy was obtained using the RSS-based extra tree optimization technique.

Indexed as

California Bearing Ratioelastic modulusmetaheuristic algorithmsmodulus of subgrade reaction

Identifiers

PMID34772040
PMCPMC8585299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.