Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34772020›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Analysis of Four Types of Anchorage Devices for Prestressed Glulam Beam and Experimental Research.

Mingfei Li, Mingtao Wu, Nan Guo, Lidan Mei, Yan Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingfei LiCollege of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4708-3283
Mingtao WuCollege of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-0843
Nan GuoCollege of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4790-0818
Lidan MeiCollege of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-1848
Yan ZhaoCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, Nanping 354300, China.
Northeast Forestry University · CNWuyi University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2572021AW11Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J01402Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2019E005Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2020E009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An anchorage device is an integral part of the prestressed Glulam beams. Therefore, its rationality and practicability have significant effects on the mechanical performance of the prestressed beams. To investigate the impact of the anchorage devices on the bearing capacity and stiffness of the prestressed beams, this paper compared and analyzed four kinds of anchors in detail through the finite element software. The results showed that when the initial mid-span deflection was 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm, the bearing capacity of prestressed beams with four anchorage devices was 80.37-177.24%, 93.56-182.51%, and 95.62-194.60% higher than that of ordinary Glulam beam, respectively. When the initial mid-span top prestresses were 1 MPa, 1.5 MPa, and 2 MPa, the bearing capacity of prestressed beams with four anchorage devices was 101.71-172.57%, 105.85-175.88%, and 109.64-180.87% higher than that of ordinary Glulam beam, respectively. In addition, based on the simulation results, the prestressed beam with the external anchorage had the highest bearing capacity and stiffness. The deformation capacity of the beam with boot anchorage was the largest. The stress distribution of the beam installed under beam anchorage was the most uniform, and the beam with slotted anchorage was easy to cause stress concentration at the notch. Finally, based on the outstanding performance of the external anchorage, it was selected to carry out one experiment, and the experimental result showed that the simulation could predict the damage model and load-deflection relationship of the prestressed beams well.

Indexed as

anchorage devicebearing capacityfinite element methodprestressed Glulam beamstiffness

Identifiers

PMID34772020
PMCPMC8585289
OpenAlexW3211241174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.