ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Comfort Evaluation of Wearable Functional Textiles.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Usability Evaluation of a Smart Textile-Based Cushion System for Ubiquitous Breathing Exercises.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bio-Inspired Thermoregulatory Textile Enabled by Flexible Bidirectional Shape Memory Polymer.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sustainable infrared-driven deposition of palladium nanoparticles on viscose for multi-functional textile engineering.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Smart Clothing and Medical Imaging Innovations for Real-Time Monitoring and Early Detection of Stroke: Bridging Technology and Patient Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- User Perceptions of Wearability of Knitted Sensor Garments for Long-Term Monitoring of Breathing Health: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups and a Questionnaire Survey.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Advancing Wearable Technology for Monitoring Heart Activity in Paediatric Populations.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023Article
- Review on Hydrogel-Based Flexible Supercapacitors for Wearable Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable E-textile systems should be comfortable so that highest efficiency of their functionality can be achieved. The development of electronic textiles (functional textiles) as a wearable technology for various applications has intensified the use of flexible wearable functional textiles instead of wearable electronics. However, the wearable functional textiles still bring comfort complications during wear. The purpose of this review paper is to sightsee and recap recent developments in the field of functional textile comfort evaluation systems. For textile-based materials which have close contact to the skin, clothing comfort is a fundamental necessity. In this paper, the effects of functional finishing on the comfort of the textile material were reviewed. A brief review of clothing comfort evaluations for textile fabrics based on subjective and objective techniques was conducted. The reasons behind the necessity for sensory evaluation for smart and functional clothing have been presented. The existing works of literature on comfort evaluation techniques applied to functional fabrics have been reviewed. Statistical and soft computing/artificial intelligence presentations from selected fabric comfort studies were also reviewed. Challenges of smart textiles and its future highlighted. Some experimental results were presented to support the review. From the aforementioned reviews, it is noted that the electronics clothing comfort evaluation of smart/functional fabrics needs more focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.