Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771684›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Machine Learning Based Prediction of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Ex Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Cristel Ruini, Sophia Schlingmann, Žan Jonke, Pinar Avci, Víctor Padrón-Laso, Florian Neumeier, Istvan Koveshazi, Ikenna U Ikeliani, Kathrin Patzer, Elena Kunrad and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Paired-agent imaging as a rapidFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Automated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma grading using deep learning with transfer learning.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristel RuiniDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-1095
Sophia SchlingmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3288-2549
Žan JonkeMunich Innovation Labs GmbH, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Pinar AvciDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Víctor Padrón-LasoMunich Innovation Labs GmbH, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Florian NeumeierM3i Industry-in-Clinic-Platform GmbH, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Istvan KoveshaziM3i Industry-in-Clinic-Platform GmbH, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Ikenna U IkelianiM3i Industry-in-Clinic-Platform GmbH, 80336 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-0999
Kathrin PatzerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Elena KunradDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1552-4723
Benjamin KendzioraDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-5380
Elke SattlerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Lars E FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Daniela HartmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-8133
LMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

Bayern Innovativ (Germany) 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image classification with convolutional neural networks (CNN) offers an unprecedented opportunity to medical imaging. Regulatory agencies in the USA and Europe have already cleared numerous deep learning/machine learning based medical devices and algorithms. While the field of radiology is on the forefront of artificial intelligence (AI) revolution, conventional pathology, which commonly relies on examination of tissue samples on a glass slide, is falling behind in leveraging this technology. On the other hand, ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (ex vivo CLSM), owing to its digital workflow features, has a high potential to benefit from integrating AI tools into the assessment and decision-making process. Aim of this work was to explore a preliminary application of CNN in digitally stained ex vivo CLSM images of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) for automated detection of tumor tissue. Thirty-four freshly excised tissue samples were prospectively collected and examined immediately after resection. After the histologically confirmed ex vivo CLSM diagnosis, the tumor tissue was annotated for segmentation by experts, in order to train the MobileNet CNN. The model was then trained and evaluated using cross validation. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the deep neural network for detecting cSCC and tumor free areas on ex vivo CLSM slides compared to expert evaluation were 0.76 and 0.91, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was equal to 0.90 and the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.85. The results demonstrate a high potential of deep learning models to detect cSCC regions on digitally stained ex vivo CLSM slides and to distinguish them from tumor-free skin.

Indexed as

convolutional networksdigital pathologydigital stainingex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopyfluorescence confocal microscopymachine learningMohs surgeryneural networksreflectance confocal microscopysquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34771684
PMCPMC8583634
OpenAlexW3209264851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.