ArticleCancers2021
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Definitive and Postoperative Radiotherapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Can Definitive Radiotherapy Be a Treatment Option?
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Impact of Charged Particle Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Advanced radiotherapy and systemic therapy in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: Current progress and future integrated strategies.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Comparison of postoperative radiotherapy and definitive radiotherapy for non-metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck, a propensity score matching based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Article
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Sinonasal Cavity: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standard treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck is surgical resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Currently, definitive radiotherapy (defRT) is considered an inadequate treatment; however, its data are based on studies using classical radiotherapy techniques. Therefore, the therapeutic effects of current radiotherapy techniques have not been adequately evaluated, and it may have underestimated the efficacy of defRT.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 44 adenoid cystic carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy based on modern treatment techniques from 1993 to 2017.
resultsTwenty-four patients underwent PORT and 20 patients underwent defRT. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients treated with PORT and defRT were 85.3% and 79.7%, respectively. The 5-year local control rates were 82.5% and 83.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall survival and local control of patients treated with PORT and defRT (
conclusionOur results show that defRT is comparable to surgical resection followed by PORT with respect to overall survival and local control. The results suggest that defRT can be an effective treatment option for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.