Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771649›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Role of Isolated Limb Perfusion in the Era of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma. A Systematic Review of The Literature.

Lourdes Sevilla-Ortega, Lara Ferrándiz-Pulido, Natalia Palazón-Carrión, María Del Carmen Álamo de la Gala, Rubén de Toro-Salas, José Garnacho-Montero, José Antonio Marcos-Rodríguez, Ana Agudo Martínez, Omar Araji-Tiliani, María Cinta Calvo-Morón and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Metastases from Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lourdes Sevilla-OrtegaClinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Lara Ferrándiz-PulidoDermatology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Natalia Palazón-CarriónClinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
María Del Carmen Álamo de la GalaClinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Rubén de Toro-SalasClinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
José Garnacho-MonteroIntensive Care Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
José Antonio Marcos-RodríguezPharmacy Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Ana Agudo MartínezRadiopharmacy Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Omar Araji-TilianiCardiovascular Surgery Department, Heart Area, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
María Cinta Calvo-MorónNuclear Medicine Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
José Miguel Barquero-ArocaCardiovascular Surgery Department, Heart Area, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Antonio Ramón Fernández-LópezAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
José María Jaime-BorregoCardiovascular Surgery Department, Heart Area, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Juan Carlos Santos-JiménezCardiovascular Surgery Department, Heart Area, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
David Moreno-RamírezDermatology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Luis de la Cruz-MerinoClinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-0535
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a locoregional procedure indicated by the unresectable melanoma of the limbs. Its complexity and highly demanding multidisciplinary approach means that it is a technique only implemented in a few referral centers around the globe. This report aims to examine its potential role in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy by conducting a systematic review of the literature on ILP.

methodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. The eligibility criteria included publications from 2000-2020 providing valid data o effectiveness, survival or toxicity. Studies in which the perfusion methodology was not clearly described, letters to the editor, non-systematic reviews and studies that applied outdated clinical guidelines were excluded. To rule out studies of a low methodological quality and assess the risk of bias, the following aspects were also required: a detailed description of the applied ILP regimen, the clinical context, follow-up periods, analyzed clinical endpoints, and the number of analyzed ILPs. The disagreements were resolved by consensus. The results are presented in tables and figures.

resultsTwenty-seven studies including 2637 ILPs were selected. The median overall response rate was 85%, with a median complete response rate of 58.5%. The median overall survival was 38 months, with a 5-year overall survival of 35%. The toxicity was generally mild according to Wieberdink toxicity criteria. DISCUSSION: ILP still offer a high efficacy in selected patients. The main limitation of our review is the heterogeneity and age of most of the articles, as well as the absence of clinical trials comparing ILP with other procedures, making it difficult to transfer its results to the current era.

conclusionsILP is still an effective and safe procedure for selected patients with unresectable melanoma of the limbs. In the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, ILP remains an acceptable and reasonable palliative treatment alternative, especially to avoid limb amputations. The ongoing clinical trials combining systemic therapies and ILP will provide more valuable information in the future to clarify the potential synergism of both strategies.

Indexed as

chemotherapyisolated limb perfusionmalignant melanomamelphalantumor necrosis factor

Identifiers

PMID34771649
PMCPMC8583108
OpenAlexW3209420097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.