Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771594›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Christian M Vonk, Adil S A Al Hinai, Diana Hanekamp, Peter J M Valk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07060001 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hypomethylating Agent Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Induction Based on 5hmC - a Novel, Blood Epigenetic Marker for Assessing Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07060001 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hypomethylating Agent Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Induction Based on 5hmC - a Novel, Blood Epigenetic Marker for Assessing Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2026 to 2029Enrolled112ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)Arms5hmC Biomarker, Venetoclax, Decitabine 20 mg/m²/day for 5 days, Azacitidine (AZA), Cytarabine (Ara-C)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Its Impact.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel Tools for Diagnosis and Monitoring of AML.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian M VonkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adil S A Al HinaiDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diana HanekampDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-1127
Peter J M ValkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLMinistry of Health · OM

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society 12507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial induction chemotherapy to eradicate the bulk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells results in complete remission (CR) in the majority of patients. However, leukemic cells persisting in the bone marrow below the morphologic threshold remain unaffected and have the potential to proliferate and re-emerge as AML relapse. Detection of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) is a promising prognostic marker for AML relapse as it can assess an individual patients' risk profile and evaluate their response to treatment. With the emergence of molecular techniques, such as next generation sequencing (NGS), a more sensitive assessment of molecular MRD markers is available. In recent years, the detection of MRD by molecular assays and its association with AML relapse and survival has been explored and verified in multiple studies. Although most studies show that the presence of MRD leads to a worse clinical outcome, molecular-based methods face several challenges including limited sensitivity/specificity, and a difficult distinction between mutations that are representative of AML rather than clonal hematopoiesis. This review describes the studies that have been performed using molecular-based assays for MRD detection in the context of other MRD detection approaches in AML, and discusses limitations, challenges and opportunities.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaclonal hematopoiesisminimal/measurable residual diseaseMRDnext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34771594
PMCPMC8582498
OpenAlexW3210613862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.