Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771566›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Monitoring cfDNA in Plasma and in Other Liquid Biopsies of Advanced EGFR Mutated NSCLC Patients: A Pilot Study and a Review of the Literature.

Michela Verzè, Roberta Minari, Letizia Gnetti, Paola Bordi, Alessandro Leonetti, Agnese Cosenza, Leonarda Ferri, Maria Majori, Massimo De Filippo, Sebastiano Buti and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michela VerzèMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Roberta MinariMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-0308
Letizia GnettiPathology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Paola BordiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Alessandro LeonettiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5415-6703
Agnese CosenzaMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Leonarda FerriMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Maria MajoriPneumology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Massimo De FilippoRadiology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-0226
Donatello GasparroMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Rita NizzoliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Cinzia AzzoniPathology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Lorena BottarelliPathology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Anna SquadrilliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Paola MozzoniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6883-8040
Marcello TiseoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-8465
University of Parma · IT

Funding

AstraZeneca USA not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to study alternatives at the tissue biopsy to study EGFR status in NSCLC patients, we evaluated three different liquid biopsy platforms (plasma, urine and exhaled breath condensate, EBC). We also reviewed the literature of the cfDNA biological sources other than plasma and compared our results with it about the sensitivity to EGFR mutation determination. Twenty-two EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC patients in progression to first-line treatment were enrolled and candidate to osimertinib. Plasma, urine and EBC samples were collected at baseline and every two months until progression. Molecular analysis of cfDNA was performed by ddPCR and compared to tissue results. At progression NGS analysis was performed. The EGFR activating mutation detection reached a sensitivity of 58 and 11% and for the T790M mutation of 45 and 10%, in plasma and urine samples, respectively. Any DNA content was recovered from EBC samples. Considering the plasma monitoring study, the worst survival was associated with positive shedding status; both plasma and urine molecular progression anticipated the radiological worsening. Our results confirmed the role of plasma liquid biopsy in testing EGFR mutational status, but unfortunately, did not evidence any improvement from the combination with alternative sources, as urine and EBC.

Indexed as

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitorsliquid biopsynon-small cell lung cancerresistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID34771566
PMCPMC8582482
OpenAlexW3209862049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.