ArticleCancers2021
The Epithelial and Stromal Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis Reveals Prognostic Factors with Digital Cytometry.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic-immune interactions in gastric cancer T cells: A single-cell atlas for prognostic biomarker identification.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Development of the oncolytic virus, CF33, and its derivatives for peritoneal-directed treatment of gastric cancer peritoneal metastases.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Article
- Five EMT-related genes signature predicts overall survival and immune environment in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Tumor heterogeneity continues to confound researchers' understanding of tumor growth and the development of an effective therapy. Digital cytometry allows interpretation of heterogeneous bulk tissue transcriptomes at the cellular level. We built a novel signature matrix to dissect epithelium and stroma signals using a scRNA-seq data set (GSE134520) for GC and then applied cell mixture deconvolution to estimate diverse epithelial, stromal, and immune cell proportions from bulk transcriptome data in four independent GC cohorts (GSE62254, GSE15459, GSE84437, and TCGA-STAD) from the GEO and TCGA databases. Robust computational methods were applied to identify strong prognostic factors for GC. We identified an EMEC population whose proportions were significantly higher in patients with stage I cancer than other stages, and it was predominantly present in tumor samples but not typically found in normal samples. We found that the ratio of EMECs to stromal cells and the ratio of adaptive T cells to monocytes were the most significant prognostic factors within the non-immune and immune factors, respectively. The STEM score, which unifies these two prognostic factors, was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.94, p=2.05×10-9). The entire GC cohort was stratified into three risk groups (high-, moderate-, and low-risk), which yielded incremental survival times (p<0.0001). For stage III disease, patients in the moderate- and low-risk groups experienced better survival benefits from radiation therapy ((HR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.06-0.4, p<0.0001), whereas those in the high-risk group did not (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.14-1.72, p=0.25). We concluded that the STEM score is a promising prognostic factor for gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.