Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771526›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Liquid Biopsy to Detect Minimal Residual Disease: Methodology and Impact.

Natasha Honoré, Rachel Galot, Cédric van Marcke, Nisha Limaye, Jean-Pascal Machiels

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Molecular switch-mediated detection ofBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Tumor-Informed ctDNA Assay to Predict Outcome in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated with PD-1 Inhibitor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha HonoréInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC, Pôle MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) ,1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Rachel GalotInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC, Pôle MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) ,1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Cédric van MarckeInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC, Pôle MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) ,1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-0630
Nisha LimayeGenetics of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer, de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Pascal MachielsInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC, Pôle MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) ,1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-9742
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEde Duve Institute · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One reason why some patients experience recurrent disease after a curative-intent treatment might be the persistence of residual tumor cells, called minimal residual disease (MRD). MRD cannot be identified by standard radiological exams or clinical evaluation. Tumor-specific alterations found in the blood indirectly diagnose the presence of MRD. Liquid biopsies thus have the potential to detect MRD, allowing, among other things, the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), or tumor-specific microRNA. Although liquid biopsy is increasingly studied, several technical issues still limit its clinical applicability: low sensitivity, poor standardization or reproducibility, and lack of randomized trials demonstrating its clinical benefit. Being able to detect MRD could give clinicians a more comprehensive view of the risk of relapse of their patients and could select patients requiring treatment escalation with the goal of improving cancer survival. In this review, we are discussing the different methodologies used and investigated to detect MRD in solid cancers, their respective potentials and issues, and the clinical impacts that MRD detection will have on the management of cancer patients.

Indexed as

ctDNAliquid biopsyminimal residual disease

Identifiers

PMID34771526
PMCPMC8582541
OpenAlexW3209920810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.