Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771522›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Expression Levels of RAD51 Inversely Correlate with Survival of Glioblastoma Patients.

Christopher Morrison, Eric Weterings, Daruka Mahadevan, Abhay Sanan, Martin Weinand, Baldassarre Stea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Antitumoral Activity of the Universal Methyl DonorMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher MorrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7763-0770
Eric WeteringsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
Daruka MahadevanMays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Abhay SananCenter for Neurosciences, Tucson, AZ 85718, USA.
Martin WeinandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Baldassarre SteaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
University of Arizona · USCenter for Neurosciences · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment failures of glioblastoma (GBM) occur within high-dose radiation fields. We hypothesized that this is due to increased capacity for DNA damage repair in GBM. We identified 24 adult GBM patients treated with maximal safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The mRNA from patients was quantified using NanoString Technologies' nCounter platform and compared with 12 non-neoplastic temporal lobe tissue samples as a control. Differential expression analysis identified seven DNA repair genes significantly upregulated in GBM tissues relative to controls (>4-fold difference, adjusted

Indexed as

GBMgene expressionNanoString nCounterprognostic markerRAD51

Identifiers

PMID34771522
PMCPMC8582387
OpenAlexW3210899981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.