Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771516›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Monitoring the Levels of Cellular NF-κB Activation States.

Johanna Meier-Soelch, Christin Mayr-Buro, Jana Juli, Lisa Leib, Uwe Linne, Jan Dreute, Argyris Papantonis, M Lienhard Schmitz, Michael Kracht

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Unraveling Endocannabinoid Signaling Pathways in Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna Meier-SoelchRudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Christin Mayr-BuroRudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Jana JuliRudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Lisa LeibRudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Uwe LinneMass Spectrometry Facility of the Department of Chemistry, Philipps University, 35032 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1473-9063
Jan DreuteInstitute of Biochemistry, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4708-2678
Argyris PapantonisInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
M Lienhard SchmitzInstitute of Biochemistry, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6984-7192
Michael KrachtRudolf Buchheim Institute of Pharmacology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-043X
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaſt Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaſt
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NF-κB signaling system plays an important regulatory role in the control of many biological processes. The activities of NF-κB signaling networks and the expression of their target genes are frequently elevated in pathophysiological situations including inflammation, infection, and cancer. In these conditions, the outcome of NF-κB activity can vary according to (i) differential activation states, (ii) the pattern of genomic recruitment of the NF-κB subunits, and (iii) cellular heterogeneity. Additionally, the cytosolic NF-κB activation steps leading to the liberation of DNA-binding dimers need to be distinguished from the less understood nuclear pathways that are ultimately responsible for NF-κB target gene specificity. This raises the need to more precisely determine the NF-κB activation status not only for the purpose of basic research, but also in (future) clinical applications. Here we review a compendium of different methods that have been developed to assess the NF-κB activation status in vitro and in vivo. We also discuss recent advances that allow the assessment of several NF-κB features simultaneously at the single cell level.

Indexed as

ChIP-seqEMSAkinasemethodsNF-κBPLARNA-FISHsignalingsingle cell assaystranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID34771516
PMCPMC8582385
OpenAlexW3208732148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.