ArticlePolymers2021
Optimization of the Warpage of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts Using Finite Element Method.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual Stresses and Distortion in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Thermal Deformation in Non-Planar Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of ABS: Experimental and Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigation on Bridging Defects in 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid Beams Using Fused Filament Fabrication.Polymers · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Performance of FFF-Printed Parts: A Review of Reinforcement and Modification Strategies for Thermoplastic Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Thermo-Mechanical Approach to Material Extrusion Process During Fused Filament Fabrication of Polymeric Samples.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Innovative Advances in Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing: Implications for Architecture and Construction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Path-Based Discrete Modeling and Process Simulation for Thermoplastic Fused Deposition Modeling Technology.Polymers · 2025Article
- Optimization of 3D Printing Nozzle Parameters and the Optimal Combination of 3D Printer Process Parameters for Engineering Plastics with High Melting Points and Large Thermal Expansion Coefficients.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Experimental Study on Warpage Phenomenon of Wax Parts Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication.Polymers · 2024Article
- Investigation of Auxetic Structural Deformation Behavior of PBAT Polymers Using Process and Finite Element Simulation.Polymers · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the most affordable and widespread additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. Despite its simplistic implementation, the physics behind this FDM process is very complex and involves rapid heating and cooling of the polymer feedstock. As a result, highly non-uniform internal stresses develop within the part, which can cause warpage deformation. The severity of the warpage is highly dependent on the process parameters involved, and therefore, currently extensive experimental studies are ongoing to assess their influence on the final accuracy of the part. In this study, a thermomechanical Finite Element model of the 3D printing process was developed using ANSYS. This model was compared against experimental results and several other analytical models available in the literature. The developed Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model demonstrated a good qualitative and quantitative correlation with the experimental results. An L9 orthogonal array, from Taguchi Design of Experiments, was used for the optimization of the warpage based on experimental results and numerical simulations. The optimum process parameters were identified for each objective and parts were printed using these process parameters. Both parts showed an approximately equal warpage value of 320 μm, which was the lowest among all 10 runs of the L9 array. Additionally, this model is extended to predict the warpage of FDM printed multi-material parts. The relative percentage error between the numerical and experimental warpage results for alternating and sandwich specimens are found to be 1.4% and 9.5%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.