Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771361›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Combining Materials Obtained by 3D-Printing and Electrospinning from Commercial Polylactide Filament to Produce Biocompatible Composites.

Pablo Romero-Araya, Victor Pino, Ariel Nenen, Verena Cárdenas, Francisca Pavicic, Pamela Ehrenfeld, Guillaume Serandour, Judit G Lisoni, Ignacio Moreno-Villoslada, Mario E Flores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pablo Romero-ArayaLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Victor PinoLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Ariel NenenLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Verena CárdenasLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Francisca PavicicFacultad de Medicina, Instituto de Anatomia, Histologia y Patologia, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Pamela EhrenfeldFacultad de Medicina, Instituto de Anatomia, Histologia y Patologia, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2519-7570
Guillaume SerandourLeufüLAB, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Instituto de Diseño y Métodos Industriales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1211-1256
Judit G LisoniFacultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-6579
Ignacio Moreno-VillosladaLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Mario E FloresLaboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4570-1487

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 11181029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of scaffolds to reach similar three-dimensional structures mimicking the natural and fibrous environment of some cells is a challenge for tissue engineering, and 3D-printing and electrospinning highlights from other techniques in the production of scaffolds. The former is a well-known additive manufacturing technique devoted to the production of custom-made structures with mechanical properties similar to tissues and bones found in the human body, but lacks the resolution to produce small and interconnected structures. The latter is a well-studied technique to produce materials possessing a fibrillar structure, having the advantage of producing materials with tuned composition compared with a 3D-print. Taking the advantage that commercial 3D-printers work with polylactide (PLA) based filaments, a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer, in this work we produce PLA-based composites by blending materials obtained by 3D-printing and electrospinning. Porous PLA fibers have been obtained by the electrospinning of recovered PLA from 3D-printer filaments, tuning the mechanical properties by blending PLA with small amounts of polyethylene glycol and hydroxyapatite. A composite has been obtained by blending two layers of 3D-printed pieces with a central mat of PLA fibers. The composite presented a reduced storage modulus as compared with a single 3D-print piece and possessing similar mechanical properties to bone tissues. Furthermore, the biocompatibility of the composites is assessed by a simulated body fluid assay and by culturing composites with 3T3 fibroblasts. We observed that all these composites induce the growing and attaching of fibroblast over the surface of a 3D-printed layer and in the fibrous layer, showing the potential of commercial 3D-printers and filaments to produce scaffolds to be used in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

biocompatible compositesbiomimetic compositesPLA 3D-printingPLA electrospun fibers

Identifiers

PMID34771361
PMCPMC8588263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.