Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771318›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Wear Resistance, Color Stability and Displacement Resistance of Milled PEEK Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns under Stimulated Chewing and High-Performance Aging.

Simone Shah Abhay, Dhanraj Ganapathy, Deepak Nallaswamy Veeraiyan, Padma Ariga, Artak Heboyan, Pokpong Amornvit, Dinesh Rokaya, Viritpon Srimaneepong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06092697 (Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06092697 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled45ConditionsClinical PerformanceArms3D printed PEEK restorations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simone Shah AbhayDepartment of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600077, India.
Dhanraj GanapathyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600077, India.
Deepak Nallaswamy VeeraiyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600077, India.
Padma ArigaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600077, India.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600077, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-3205
Pokpong AmornvitGolden Jubilee Medical Centre, Mahidol University, Nakon Pathom, Salaya 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-676X
Dinesh RokayaDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3854-667X
Viritpon SrimaneepongDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8545-2713
Saveetha University · INChulalongkorn University · THMahidol University · THWalailak University · THYerevan State Medical University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been introduced to the dental market as a high-performance and chemically inert biomaterial. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance, abrasiveness, color stability, and displacement resistance of zirconia and PEEK milled crowns. An ideal tooth preparation of a first maxillary molar was done and scanned by an intraoral scanner to make a digital model. Then, the prosthetic crown was digitally designed on the CAD software, and the STL file was milled in zirconia (CaroZiir S, Carol Zircolite Pvt. Ltd., Gujarat, India) and PEEK (BioHpp, Bredent GmbH, Senden, Germany) crowns using five-axis CNC milling machines. The wear resistance, color stability, and displacement resistance of the milled monolithic zirconia with unfilled PEEK crowns using a chewing simulator with thermocyclic aging (120,000 cycles) were compared. The antagonist wear, material wear, color stability, and displacement were evaluated and compared among the groups using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test. Zirconia was shown to be three times more abrasive than PEEK (

Indexed as

aging processbiodegradationbiomaterialsCAD/CAMchewing simulationcolor stabilitycrownsdental materialsdentistrydisplacement resistancePEEKwear resistancezirconia

Identifiers

PMID34771318
PMCPMC8587121
OpenAlexW3208948866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.