ArticlePolymers2021
Fabrication of 3D Printed Poly(lactic acid)/Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Using TGF-β1 for Promoting Bone Regeneration.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of growth factors in bone tissue engineering delivery systems and collaborative innovation strategies.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Experimental study on the in vitro osteogenic and chondrogenic ability of fat stem cells combined with 3D-printed porous scaffolds.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Design and Characterization of Biomimetic Hybrid Construct Based on Hyaluronic Acid and Alginate Bioink for Regeneration of Articular Cartilage.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Advantages of Using 3D Spheroid Culture Systems in Toxicological and Pharmacological Assessment for Osteogenesis Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Rising role of 3D-printing in delivery of therapeutics for infectious disease.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024Review
- Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Orthopedic Therapeutics: Properties, Applications, and Future Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Addressable microfluidics technology for non-sacrificial analysis of biomaterial implantsBiomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Mechanical Characterization and Suitability Assessment for Producing Wrist-Hand Orthoses.Polymers · 2023Article
- Emerging 3D bioprinting applications in plastic surgery.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Fabrication of Interleukin-4 Encapsulated Bioactive Microdroplets for Regulating Inflammation and Promoting Osteogenesis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- Assessment of different manufacturing techniques for the production of bioartificial scaffolds as soft organ transplant substitutes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Anatomically and Biomechanically Relevant Monolithic Total Disc Replacement Made of 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane.Polymers · 2022Article
- The Effect of PCL Addition on 3D-Printable PLA/HA Composite Filaments for the Treatment of Bone Defects.Polymers · 2022Article
- Polylactide Perspectives in Biomedicine: From Novel Synthesis to the Application Performance.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Modified Histopathological Protocol for Poly-ɛ-Caprolactone Scaffolds Preserving Their Trabecular, Honeycomb-like Structure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Functionalized multidimensional biomaterials for bone microenvironment engineering applications: Focus on osteoimmunomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our research was designed to evaluate the effect on bone regeneration with 3-dimensional (3D) printed polylactic acid (PLA) and 3D printed polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds, determine the more effective option for enhancing bone regeneration, and offer tentative evidence for further research and clinical application. Employing the 3D printing technique, the PLA and PCL scaffolds showed similar morphologies, as confirmed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mechanical strength was significantly higher in the PLA group (63.4 MPa) than in the PCL group (29.1 MPa) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.