Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34771210›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Comparison of Machine Learning Methods towards Developing Interpretable Polyamide Property Prediction.

Franklin Langlang Lee, Jaehong Park, Sushmit Goyal, Yousef Qaroush, Shihu Wang, Hong Yoon, Aravind Rammohan, Youngseon Shim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Franklin Langlang LeeScience and Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-9898
Jaehong ParkCSE Team, Data & Information Technology (DIT) Center, Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd., Samsungjeonja-ro, Hwaseong 18448, Korea.
Sushmit GoyalScience and Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-4959
Yousef QaroushScience and Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831, USA.
Shihu WangScience and Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831, USA.
Hong YoonCorning Technology Center Korea, Corning Precision Materials Co., Ltd., 212 Tangjeong-ro, Asan 31454, Korea.
Aravind RammohanScience and Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831, USA.
Youngseon ShimCSE Team, Data & Information Technology (DIT) Center, Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd., Samsungjeonja-ro, Hwaseong 18448, Korea.
Corning (United States) · USSamsung (South Korea) · KRCorning (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyamides are often used for their superior thermal, mechanical, and chemical properties. They form a diverse set of materials that have a large variation in properties between linear to aromatic compounds, which renders the traditional quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) challenging. We use extended connectivity fingerprints (ECFP) and traditional QSPR fingerprints to develop machine learning models to perform high fidelity prediction of glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), density (ρ), and tensile modulus (E). The non-linear model using random forest is in general found to be more accurate than linear regression; however, using feature selection or regularization, the accuracy of linear models is shown to be improved significantly to become comparable to the more complex nonlinear algorithm. We find that none of the models or fingerprints were able to accurately predict the tensile modulus E, which we hypothesize is due to heterogeneity in data and data sources, as well as inherent challenges in measuring it. Finally, QSPR models revealed that the fraction of rotatable bonds, and the rotational degree of freedom affects polyamide properties most profoundly and can be used for back of the envelope calculations for a quick estimate of the polymer attributes (glass transition temperature, melting temperature, and density). These QSPR models, although having slightly lower prediction accuracy, show the most promise for the polymer chemist seeking to develop an intuition of ways to modify the chemistry to enhance specific attributes.

Indexed as

machine learning 1polyamide 2QSPR 3

Identifiers

PMID34771210
PMCPMC8587315
OpenAlexW3209036114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.