ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Recent Analytical Method for Detection of Chemical Adulterants in Herbal Medicine.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multi-Platform Metabolomics for Fraud Detection in Spices and Botanical Food Supplements: From Fingerprint Acquisition to Decision-Grade Evidence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Natural Products and Selective Apoptosis: A Cancer-Cell Vulnerability-State Framework from Redox Imbalance to Membrane-Ion Dysregulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microfabricated multiplexed sensor for the determination of undisclosed aphrodisiac medications in herbal products.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Liquid-filled stick microextraction with a built-in acidifier enabling pH-adjustment-free analysis of illegal NSAIDs in herbal extracts.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Herbal Supplements with Anxiolytic, Antidepressant, and Sedative Action: A Review of Clinical Data and Toxicological Risks.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Determination of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Antineoplastic Agents in Pharmaceutical and Biological Matrices: An Overview of Recent Analytical Techniques.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Review
- Natural products and nutraceuticals in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases: efficacy, mechanisms, and comparative insights.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- UPLC-MS/MS-Based Target Screening of 90 Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in 5 Dietary Supplements.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Existing status and future advancements of adulteration detection techniques in herbal products.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Single versus Double Coffee-Ring Effect Patterns in Thin-Layer Chromatography Coupled with Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Anti-Diabetic Drugs Adulterated in Herbal Products.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Nutraceuticals: Therapy Support and Formulation Challenges.Nutrients · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbal medicine has become popular in recent years as an alternative medicine. The problem arises when herbal medicines contain an undeclared synthetic drug that is illegally added, since it is a natural product that does not contain any chemical drugs due to the potential cause of harmful effects. Supervision of herbal medicines is important to ensure that these herbal medicines are still safe to use. Thus, developing a reliable analytical technique for the determination of adulterated drugs in herbal medicine is gaining interest. This review aims to provide a recent analytical method that has been used within the past 5 years (2016-2021) for the determination of chemical adulterants in herbal medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.